Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKeating, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorEwart, Lorna
dc.contributor.authorGrundy, Luke
dc.contributor.authorValentin, Jean-Pierre
dc.contributor.authorGrundy, David
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-29T13:49:06Z
dc.date.available2015-04-29T13:49:06Z
dc.date.issued2014-07
dc.identifier.citationKeating , C , Ewart , L , Grundy , L , Valentin , J-P & Grundy , D 2014 , ' Translational potential of a mouse in-vitro bioassay in predicting gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions in phase 1 clinical trials ' , Neurogastroenterology and Motility , vol. 26 , no. 7 , pp. 980-9 . https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12349
dc.identifier.issn1365-2982
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/15878
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
dc.description.abstractBackground: Motility-related gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions (GADRs) such as diarrhoea and constipation are a common and deleterious feature associated with drug development. Novel biomarkers of GI function are therefore required to aid decision making on the gastrointestinal liability of compounds in development. Methods: Fifteen compounds associated with or without clinical GADRs were used to assess the ability of an in vitro colonic motility bioassay to predict motility-related GADRs. Compounds were examined in a blinded fashion for their effects on mouse colonic peristaltic motor complexes in vitro. For each compound concentration-response relationships were determined and the results compared to clinical data. Compounds were also assessed using gastrointestinal transit measurements obtained using an in vivo rat charcoal meal model. Key Results: Within a clinically relevant dosing range, the in vitro assay identified 5 true and 3 false positives, 4 true and 3 false negatives, which gave a predictive capacity of 60%. The in vivo assay detected 4 true and 4 false positives, 4 false and 3 true negatives, giving rise to a predictive capacity for this model of 47%. Conclusion & Inferences: Overall these results imply that both assays are poor predictors of GADRs. Further analysis would benefit from a larger compound set, but the data shows a clear need for improved models for use in safety pharmacology assessment of GI motilityen
dc.format.extent578991
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofNeurogastroenterology and Motility
dc.titleTranslational potential of a mouse in-vitro bioassay in predicting gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions in phase 1 clinical trialsen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Mechanisms of Disease and Drug Discovery
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Science
dc.contributor.institutionBasic and Clinical Science Unit
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/nmo.12349
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record