dc.contributor.author | Hoggan, Eve | |
dc.contributor.author | Trendafilov, Dari | |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmaniemi, Teemu | |
dc.contributor.author | Raisamo, Roope | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-06T08:21:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-07-06T08:21:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-06-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hoggan , E , Trendafilov , D , Ahmaniemi , T & Raisamo , R 2011 , Squeeze vs. tilt : A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback . in CHI EA'11 Procs Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . ACM Press , pp. 1309-1314 , 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011 , Vancouver, BC , Canada , 7/05/11 . https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979766 | |
dc.identifier.citation | conference | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9781450302289 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/16132 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents an investigation into the performance of squeezing as a manipulative interaction technique in comparison to tilting with an aim to answer two questions: is squeezing an effective input technique for mobile devices and can tactile feedback improve performance? The experiment results show that both input methods are viable but squeezing is significantly faster and more sustainable than tilting (with and without tactile feedback). | en |
dc.format.extent | 6 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | ACM Press | |
dc.relation.ispartof | CHI EA'11 Procs Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems | |
dc.subject | Haptic I/O | |
dc.subject | Mobile interaction | |
dc.subject | Pressure | |
dc.subject | Squeeze | |
dc.subject | Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design | |
dc.subject | Human-Computer Interaction | |
dc.subject | Software | |
dc.title | Squeeze vs. tilt : A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback | en |
dc.contributor.institution | School of Computer Science | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1145/1979742.1979766 | |
rioxxterms.type | Other | |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |