Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSalminen, Katri
dc.contributor.authorSurakka, Veikko
dc.contributor.authorLylykangas, Jani
dc.contributor.authorRantala, Jussi
dc.contributor.authorAhmaniemi, Teemu
dc.contributor.authorRaisamo, Roope
dc.contributor.authorTrendafilov, Dari
dc.contributor.authorKildal, Johan
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-06T08:51:06Z
dc.date.available2015-07-06T08:51:06Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-17
dc.identifier.citationSalminen , K , Surakka , V , Lylykangas , J , Rantala , J , Ahmaniemi , T , Raisamo , R , Trendafilov , D & Kildal , J 2012 , ' Tactile modulation of emotional speech samples ' , Advances in Human-Computer Interaction , vol. 2012 , 741304 . https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/741304
dc.identifier.issn1687-5893
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/16134
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2012 Katri Salminen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
dc.description.abstractTraditionally only speech communicates emotions via mobile phone. However, in daily communication the sense of touch mediates emotional information during conversation. The present aim was to study if tactile stimulation affects emotional ratings of speech when measured with scales of pleasantness, arousal, approachability, and dominance. In the Experiment 1 participants rated speech-only and speech-tactile stimuli. The tactile signal mimicked the amplitude changes of the speech. In the Experiment 2 the aim was to study whether the way the tactile signal was produced affected the ratings. The tactile signal either mimicked the amplitude changes of the speech sample in question, or the amplitude changes of another speech sample. Also, concurrent static vibration was included. The results showed that the speech-tactile stimuli were rated as more arousing and dominant than the speech-only stimuli. The speech-only stimuli were rated as more approachable than the speech-tactile stimuli, but only in the Experiment 1. Variations in tactile stimulation also affected the ratings. When the tactile stimulation was static vibration the speech-tactile stimuli were rated as more arousing than when the concurrent tactile stimulation was mimicking speech samples. The results suggest that tactile stimulation offers new ways of modulating and enriching the interpretation of speech.en
dc.format.extent13
dc.format.extent2500357
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Human-Computer Interaction
dc.subjectHuman-Computer Interaction
dc.titleTactile modulation of emotional speech samplesen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Computer Science
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1155/2012/741304
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record