Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJansari, Ashok
dc.contributor.authorCocchini, Gianna
dc.contributor.authorJenkinson, Paul
dc.contributor.authorBajo, Ana
dc.contributor.authorIetswaart, Magdalena
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-08T13:02:02Z
dc.date.available2015-10-08T13:02:02Z
dc.date.issued2015-10
dc.identifier.citationJansari , A , Cocchini , G , Jenkinson , P , Bajo , A & Ietswaart , M 2015 , ' NHS ethics : Shoe-bombers and why ‘less needs to be more' ' , Cortex , vol. 71 , pp. 409-411 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.06.011
dc.identifier.issn0010-9452
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 8738638
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: a00dd5a4-978e-480a-be93-ef69dd041d0f
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84941874170
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/16511
dc.descriptionCC-BY-NC-ND Date of Acceptance: 16/06/2015
dc.description.abstractNeuropsychological research poses several challenges. Some of these, such as developing new ideas and conducting innovative studies, are approached with great enthusiasm, and are an integral and motivating part of academic research. By contrast, other challenges feel like gruelling, near-impossible tasks, designed to test the will of would-be researchers. For many, the process of obtaining UK National Health Service (NHS) ethics approval is the archetypal example of such a task. Baron (this issue) highlights several of the difficulties concerning the ethical review of research involving human subjects, identifying flaws in the current system, and their negative impact on the research process. In this commentary we further reflect on the current system for gaining ethics approval to work with brain-injured patients in the UK, and its implications for neuropsychology research in the UK and beyonden
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCortex
dc.rightsEmbargoed
dc.titleNHS ethics : Shoe-bombers and why ‘less needs to be more'en
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionPsychology
dc.contributor.institutionCognitive Neuropsychology
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2016-07-02
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.description.versiontypeFinal Accepted Version
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-10
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionSMUR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.06.011
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-07-02
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.date.embargo2016-07-02
herts.rights.accesstypeEmbargoed


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record