Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoote, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorTwiddy, Maureen
dc.contributor.authorBaird, Wendy
dc.contributor.authorBirks, Yvonne
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Clare
dc.contributor.authorBeever, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-08T13:32:03Z
dc.date.available2015-10-08T13:32:03Z
dc.date.issued2015-10
dc.identifier.citationBoote , J , Twiddy , M , Baird , W , Birks , Y , Clarke , C & Beever , D 2015 , ' Supporting public involvement in research design and grant development : A case study of a public involvement award scheme managed by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Design Service (RDS) ' , Health expectations , vol. 18 , no. 5 , pp. 1481-1493 . https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12130
dc.identifier.issn1369-6513
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 8114716
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 5a714d78-27eb-448d-b7ae-5b4406c2b288
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84942296797
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/16513
dc.description.abstractBackground: It is good practice for the public to be involved in developing health research. Resources should be available for researchers to fund the involvement of the public in the development of their grants. Objective: To describe a funding award scheme to support public involvement in grant development, managed by an NIHR Research Design Service (RDS). Case examples of how the award contributed to successful grant applications and findings from a recent evaluation of the scheme are presented. Design: A case study of resource provision to support public involvement activities in one region of England. Participants: University and NHS-based researchers, and members of the public. Findings: Between 2009 and 2012, the RDS approved 45 public involvement funding awards (totalling nearly £19 000). These awards contributed to 27 submitted applications at the time of writing, of which 11 were successful (totalling over £7.5 million). The evaluation revealed difficulties encountered by some researchers when involving the public in grant development, which led to suggestions about how the scheme could be improved. Conclusion: This award scheme represents an efficient method of providing researchers with resources to involve the public in grant development and would appear to represent good value for money.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofHealth expectations
dc.subjectGrant development
dc.subjectPublic involvement
dc.subjectResearch design
dc.subjectSupport and resources
dc.subjectPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
dc.titleSupporting public involvement in research design and grant development : A case study of a public involvement award scheme managed by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Design Service (RDS)en
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Adult Nursing and Primary Care
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12130
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record