Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoyle, Sally
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Hilary
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, Fiona
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-28T18:58:54Z
dc.date.available2016-11-28T18:58:54Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-09
dc.identifier.citationBoyle , S , Thomas , H & Brooks , F 2015 , ' Women’s views on partnership working with midwives during pregnancy and childbirth ' , Midwifery , vol. 32 , pp. 21-29 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.09.001
dc.identifier.issn0266-6138
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2072-7827/work/32371692
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/17361
dc.descriptionThis is the Accepted Manuscript version of the following article: Sally Boyle, Hilary Thomas, and Fiona Brooks, ‘Women׳s views on partnership working with midwives during pregnancy and childbirth’, Midwifery, Vol. 32: 21-29, January 2016, which has been published in final form at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.09.001. This manuscript version is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License CC BY NC-ND 4.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
dc.description.abstractObjective: To explore whether the UK Government agenda for partnership working and choice was realised or desired for women during pregnancy and childbirth. Design: A qualitative study was used to explore women’s experience of partnership working with midwives. Data was generated using a diary interview method throughout pregnancy and birth. Setting: 16 women were recruited from two district general hospitals in the South East of England. Findings: Three themes emerged from the data: organisation of care, relationships and choice. Women described their antenatal care as ‘ticking the box’, with midwives focusing on the biomedical aspects of care but not meeting their psycho-social and emotional needs. Time poverty was a significant factor in this finding. Women rarely described developing a partnership relationship with midwives due to a lack of continuity of care and time in which to formulate such relationships. In contrast women attending birth centres for their antenatal care were able to form relationships with a group of midwives who shared a philosophy of care and had sufficient time in which to meet women’s holistic needs. Most of the women in this study did not feel they were offered the choices as outlined in the national choice agenda (DoH, 2007). Implications for Practice: NHS Trusts should review the models of care available to women to ensure that these are not only safe but support women’s psycho-social and emotional needs as well. Partnership case loading models enable midwives and women to form trusting relationships that empowers women to feel involved in decision making and to exercise choice. Group antenatal and postnatal care models also effectively utilise midwifery time whilst increasing maternal satisfaction and social engagement. Technology should also be used more effectively to facilitate inter-professional communication and to provide a more flexible service to women.en
dc.format.extent9
dc.format.extent868278
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMidwifery
dc.subjectwomen's views
dc.subjectpartnership relationships
dc.subjectorganisation of care
dc.subjectchoice
dc.subjectmidwives
dc.titleWomen’s views on partnership working with midwives during pregnancy and childbirthen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Adult Nursing and Primary Care
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care
dc.contributor.institutionNursing, Midwifery and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionPatient Experience and Public Involvement
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionCommunities, Young People and Family Lives
dc.contributor.institutionWeight and Obesity Research Group
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2016-09-09
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.midw.2015.09.001
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record