Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMatsika, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, Conor
dc.contributor.authorGrasso, Marzio
dc.contributor.authorDe Iorio, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-16T12:03:38Z
dc.date.available2016-12-16T12:03:38Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-16
dc.identifier.citationMatsika , E , O'Neill , C , Grasso , M & De Iorio , A 2016 , ' Selection and ranking of the main beam geometry of a freight wagon for lightweighting ' , Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit , vol. 0 , no. 0 , pp. 1-19 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409716677075
dc.identifier.issn0954-4097
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 10582938
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: d49b53d8-b4f2-4ae8-ab36-7cb2b3830e49
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85047817695
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/17431
dc.description.abstractThe traditional freight wagons employ I-beam sections as the main load-bearing structures. The primary loads they carry are vertical (from loading units) and axial (from train traction and buffers). Ease of manufacturing has played an important role in the selection of the I-beam for this role. However, with lightweighting increasingly becoming an important design objective, an evaluation needs to be done to assess if there are other existing or new section profiles (geometry) that would carry the same operational loads but are lighter. This paper presents an evaluation of 24 section profiles for their ability to take the operational loads of freight wagons. The profiles are divided into two categories, namely ‘conventional – made by wagon manufacturers (including the I-beam)’ and ‘pre-fabricated’ sections. For ranking purposes, the primary design objectives or key performance indicators were bending stress, associated deflection and buckling load. Subsequently, this was treated as a multi-criteria decision-making process. The loading conditions were applied as prescribed by the EU standard EN 12663-2. To carry out structural analysis, finite element analysis was implemented using ANSYS software. To determine the validity of the finite element analysis results, correlation analysis was done with respect to beam theory. Parameters considered were: maximum stress, deflection, second moment of area, thickness, bending stiffness and flexural rigidity. The paper discusses the impreciseness related to the use of beam theory since the local stiffness of the beam is neglected leading to an inaccurate estimation of the buckling load and the vertical displacement. Even more complicated can be the estimation of the maximum stress to be used for comparison when features such as spot welds are present. The nominal stress values computed by means of Navier equation lead to an inaccurate value of the stress since it neglects the variations in the local stiffness, which can lead to an increase in the bending stress values. The main objective of the paper is the applicability of particular section profiles to the railway field with the aim of lightweighting the main structure. Sections commonly adopted in civil applications have also been investigated to understand the stiffness and strength under railway service loads. The common approach reported in literature so far makes use either of the beam theory1 or topological finite element approach2 to determine the optimised shape under the action of the simplified loading conditions. Although the previous approaches seem to be more general, the assumptions made affect the optimisation process since the stress state differs from that attained under the actual service load in the real structure. In this paper, the use of complex shape cross sections and detailed finite element models allows to take account of the real behaviour in terms of stiffness distribution and local stress effects due to manufacturing features like welds. The structural assessment carried out with the detailed models also allows for the proper comparison among the considered sections. Analysis of the results showed that three out of the 24 section profiles have the highest potential to be fitted as the main load-bearing beams for freight wagons, with the pre-fabricated Z-section being the optimum of the three.en
dc.format.extent19
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
dc.rights/dk/atira/pure/core/openaccesspermission/open
dc.subjectIntermodal freight wagon
dc.subjectsection profiles/geometry
dc.subjectbulking, bending
dc.subjectdeflection
dc.subjectmulti-criteria decision making
dc.subjectlightweighting
dc.titleSelection and ranking of the main beam geometry of a freight wagon for lightweightingen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Engineering and Technology
dc.contributor.institutionMaterials and Structures
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Engineering and Technology
dc.description.versiontypeFinal Published version
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-10-08
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0954409716677075
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.rights.accesstypeopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record