Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMadden, Angela
dc.contributor.authorMulrooney, Hilda M.
dc.contributor.authorShah, Selina
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-18T17:26:28Z
dc.date.available2017-01-18T17:26:28Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-01
dc.identifier.citationMadden , A , Mulrooney , H M & Shah , S 2016 , ' Estimation of energy expenditure using prediction equations in overweight and obese adults : a systematic review ' , Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics , vol. 29 , no. 4 , pp. 458-476 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12355
dc.identifier.issn0952-3871
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/17529
dc.descriptionThis is the Accepted Manuscript version of the following article: A. M. Madden, H. M. Mulrooney, & S. Shah, ‘Estimation of energy expenditure using prediction equations in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review’, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol 29 (4), pp. 458-476, February 2016, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.12355/epdf This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
dc.description.abstractBackground: Estimates of energy requirements are needed in weight management and are usually determined using prediction equations. The objective of these two systematic reviews was to identify which equations based on simple anthropometric and demographic variables provide the most accurate and precise estimates of (1) resting energy expenditure (REE) and (2) total energy expenditure (TEE) in healthy obese adults. Methodology: Systematic searches for relevant studies in healthy adults with body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 and published in English were undertaken using Cinahl, Cochrane Library, OpenGrey, PubMed and Web of Science (completed March 2014). Search terms included metabolism, calorimetry, obesity and prediction equations. Data extraction, study appraisal and synthesis followed guidelines from PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses). Results: From 243 REE papers and 254 TEE papers identified, 21 and 4 studies respectively met the inclusion criteria. (1) The most accurate REE predictions varied with BMI subgroup: WHO (weight and height) ≥25 and ≥30 kg/m2; Mifflin 30-39.9 kg/m2; Henry ≥40 kg/m2. The most precise REE predictions were obtained using Mifflin in BMI 30-39.9 and ≥40 kg/m2 where approximately 75% of predictions were within 10% of measured REE. (2) No accurate or precise predictions of TEE were identified. Conclusion: No single prediction equation provides accurate and precise REE estimates in all obese adults. Mifflin equations are recommended in this population although errors exceed 10% in 25% of those assessed. There is no evidence to support the use of prediction equations in estimating TEE in obesity.en
dc.format.extent19
dc.format.extent914210
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
dc.subjectEnergy expenditure
dc.subjectbasal metabolic rate
dc.subjectadults
dc.subjectobesity
dc.subjectoverweight
dc.subjectprediction equations
dc.titleEstimation of energy expenditure using prediction equations in overweight and obese adults : a systematic reviewen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionAllied Health Professions
dc.contributor.institutionFood Policy, Nutrition and Diet
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionWeight and Obesity Research Group
dc.contributor.institutionBiosciences Research Group
dc.contributor.institutionAgriculture, Food and Veterinary Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-03-01
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jhn.12355
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record