Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWong, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Nathan
dc.contributor.authorJeraj, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorVilar, Enric
dc.contributor.authorViljoen, Adie
dc.contributor.authorFarrington, Kenneth
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-24T14:27:27Z
dc.date.available2017-01-24T14:27:27Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-30
dc.identifier.citationWong , J , Davies , N , Jeraj , H , Vilar , E , Viljoen , A & Farrington , K 2016 , ' A comparative study of blood endotoxin detection in haemodialysis patients ' , Journal of Inflammation , vol. 13 , no. 24 , pp. 24 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12950-016-0132-5
dc.identifier.issn1476-9255
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 10603723
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f0055bf3-201a-49cd-bcb7-66e8673ec97d
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 27478413
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84979713788
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/17555
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Wong et al Journal of Inflammation (2016) 13:24, the version of record is available online at doi: 10.1186/s12950-016-0132-5
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Endotoxemia is commonly reported in patients receiving haemodialysis and implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic inflammation. The Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay is the most commonly used blood endotoxin detection assay. Two kinetic variations of the assay are commercially available - the turbidimetric and chromogenic assay, it is unknown which assay is superior for endotoxin detection in uremic patients. Selection of the optimum LAL technique for endotoxin detection in haemodialysis patients is important to further understanding of the sequela of endotoxemia and development of endotoxin-lowering strategies in this population. METHOD: A turbidimetric and chromogenic LAL assay from the same manufacturer were directly compared. We investigated the ability of both LAL assays to detect endotoxin in uremic plasma. Plasma samples from haemodialysis patients and healthy controls were spiked with endotoxin and percentage spike recovery for the chromogenic and turbidimetric assay was determined. Assay accuracy and precision were compared between both LAL assays. RESULTS: The turbidimetric assay had greater accuracy than the chromogenic assay. Spike recovery was 113.8 % vs. 53.8 % for the turbidimetric and chromogenic assay respectively. Assay bias was higher in the chromogenic assay (-0.384EU/mL vs. 0.011EU/mL). The turbidimetric assay demonstrated greater precision compared to the chromogenic assay. Coefficient of variation ranged from 4.5 to 24.1 % for the turbidimetric assay and 25.8-26.5 % for the chromogenic assay. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest that the kinetic turbidimetric LAL assay has greater accuracy and precision than the chromogenic assay and is the optimum LAL technique for endotoxin detection in haemodialysis patients, though these findings should be verified using LAL reagents from other sources.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Inflammation
dc.subjectendotoxin
dc.subjecthaemodialysis
dc.subjectinflammation
dc.titleA comparative study of blood endotoxin detection in haemodialysis patientsen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Postgraduate Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionBasic and Clinical Science Unit
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12950-016-0132-5
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record