Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerger, Dan
dc.contributor.authorWild, Charles
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-30T13:33:25Z
dc.date.available2017-06-30T13:33:25Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-25
dc.identifier.citationBerger , D & Wild , C 2016 , ' The proposed Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) for UK Universities ' , Paper presented at 22nd International Academic Conference, IISES , Lisbon , Portugal , 22/03/16 - 25/03/16 .
dc.identifier.citationconference
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/18703
dc.descriptionDan Berger, Charles Wild, ‘The proposed Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) for UK Universities’, paper presented at the International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences (IISES) 22nd International Academic Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 22-25 March, 2016.
dc.description.abstractThe role of universities within society has been the subject of constant discussion and conjecture amongst politicians, the public, as well as within the Higher Education (HE) sector itself. However, this issue has come ever more to the forefront of people’s minds in recent times due to the comprehensive spending review (CSR), related concerns regarding student fees and public debt, and governmental demands for the increased accountability of Universities in terms of student satisfaction and perceived ‘value for money’. The Research Excellence Framework (REF), which replaced the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE), is accepted as a reasonably effective means by which universities, and their researchers, may be assessed periodically and subsequently allocated Quality Research (QR) funding in recognition, as well as to reinforce, research excellence in the HE sector. However, the results of any exercise will be interpreted in a number of ways and, inevitably, has led to claims that the ‘teaching’ function of universities has become the poor relation to the sector's research agenda. There have been a number of initiatives which have sought to address this perceived imbalance, and to regulate, monitor or even promote the educational function of universities. Amongst these have been Teaching Quality Assessments, Centres of Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETLs), and the most recent initiative in the form of the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF). In many respects, it is hard to challenge the principle that universities should be assessed in the same way for their teaching function as they are for their research activities and outputs. Indeed, the incorporation of 'impact' into the REF offers a seductive promise of similar connections that may be made with teaching in the form of progression, achievement and employability statistics. After all, this is the era of analytics and Big Data, why shouldn't it be used as part of a new system if it is readily available across the HE sector? The authors don't, in principle, disagree with this direction of travel. However, as with any new initiative, time and thought should not only be given to the precise objective of this exercise, but also to the potential pitfalls that may result from making a less than perfect choice. In this respect, the consultation surrounding the current green paper '...' may be likened to the following passage from Lewis Carrol’s ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland: "Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?"en
dc.format.extent170472
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectteaching excellence framework
dc.subjectthesholds of quality
dc.subjectLearning and Teaching
dc.subjectteaching quality
dc.subjecteducational gain
dc.titleThe proposed Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) for UK Universitiesen
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Law School
dc.contributor.institutionLaw
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.iises.net/past-conferences/academic/22nd-international-academic-conference-lisbon/page-conference-program-22IAC?rid=5701
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record