Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarlow, Janet
dc.contributor.authorMason, Rebecca
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-11T15:19:50Z
dc.date.available2017-07-11T15:19:50Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-17
dc.identifier.citationBarlow , J & Mason , R 2015 , ' A poor fit : One person's flexibility is another persons insecurity ' , New Law Journal , no. 7668 . < http://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/poor-fit >
dc.identifier.issn0306-6479
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 10503624
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 65a185d6-c3c7-4ef8-bac0-dec336647d32
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84926991140
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/18873
dc.descriptionJanet Barlow and Rebecca Mason, "A poor fit: One person's flexibility is another person's insecurity", New Law Journal, Issue 7668, September 2015.
dc.description.abstractThe much debated pre-election hot topic of zero hours contracts finally saw a reform to the law on 26 March under the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015. Section 153 of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 amends the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) by inserting a new s 27A banning the use of exclusivity clauses and for the first time giving a statutory definition of a zero hours contract. In this article we shall be considering the implication of this ban and shall examine this new definition and whether it goes any way to helping establish employment status; a requisite for full employment protection.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofNew Law Journal
dc.subjectZero hours contracts
dc.titleA poor fit : One person's flexibility is another persons insecurityen
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Law School
dc.description.statusNon peer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/poor-fit
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record