Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerger, Dan
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-21T14:49:50Z
dc.date.available2017-07-21T14:49:50Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-05
dc.identifier.citationBerger , D 2014 , ' Response to ‘On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: response to Fenton et al’ ' Science & Justice , vol. 54 , no. 4 , pp. 319-320 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2014.05.005
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 9968293
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f7575ef9-ce9c-4d4a-aa72-b8733cd6b8af
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84903773747
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19033
dc.descriptionN. Fenton,D. Lagnado, A. Hsu, D. Berger, and M. Neil, 'Response to “On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al.”', Reply to Letter to the Editor, Science & Justice, Vol. 54(4): 319-320, July 2014. Available online at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2014.05.005
dc.format.extent2
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofScience & Justice
dc.titleResponse to ‘On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: response to Fenton et al’en
dc.contributor.institutionLaw
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Law School
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolHertfordshire Law School
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2014.05.005
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.rights.accesstypeopenAccess


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record