Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcLachlan, Chris
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Reece
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-25T16:07:52Z
dc.date.available2017-07-25T16:07:52Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-24
dc.identifier.citationMcLachlan , C & Garcia , R 2015 , ' Philosophy in practice? Doctoral struggles with ontology and subjectivity in qualitative interviewing ' , Management Learning , vol. 46 , no. 2 , pp. 195-210 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507615574634
dc.identifier.issn1350-5076
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 10778876
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: bf3ca991-b1ba-4db1-898e-8e85dcb31173
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84925399468
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19067
dc.descriptionThis document is an Accepted Manuscript. The final, definitive version of this paper has been published in Management Learning, Vol. 46 (2), March 2015, published by SAGE Publishing, All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstractThis article presents an auto-ethnographic, narrative account of the struggles we – as doctoral students workingin a business school – experienced navigating the link between research philosophy and methodology. We focus on a popular philosophical perspective among doctoral students: critical realism. In particular, we use an illustrative example of how we sought to apply this seemingly abstract philosophical perspective in practice in our qualitative interviews, using what we term the ontological whats and epistemological hows. Our initial critical realist approach proved inadequate, however, prompting us to understand qualitative interviewing in moresocial constructionist terms. Given this, we suggest that doctoral students (and researchers) are reflexive and provocative in their use of applying research philosophy to methodology. In sharing our experiences, we offera pedagogical contribution for fellow doctoral students and qualitative researchers alike.en
dc.format.extent16
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofManagement Learning
dc.titlePhilosophy in practice? : Doctoral struggles with ontology and subjectivity in qualitative interviewingen
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Business School
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1350507615574634
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record