Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSridharan, S
dc.contributor.authorWong, J
dc.contributor.authorVilar, E
dc.contributor.authorFarrington, K
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-22T13:04:07Z
dc.date.available2017-08-22T13:04:07Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-27
dc.identifier.citationSridharan , S , Wong , J , Vilar , E & Farrington , K 2016 , ' Comparison of energy estimates in chronic kidney disease using doubly-labelled water ' , Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association , vol. 29 , no. 1 , pp. 59-66 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12326
dc.identifier.issn0952-3871
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19251
dc.descriptionThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: S. Sridharan, J. Wong, E. Vilar, and K. Farrington, ‘Comparison of energy estimates in chronic kidney disease using doubly-labelled water’, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol. 29 (1): 59-66, February 2016, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12326. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. © 2015 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Total energy expenditure (TEE) is estimated in clinical practice as a combined measure of resting energy expenditure and physical activity level. Commonly available questionnaires to estimate physical activity level have not been validated in patients with kidney disease using the doubly-labelled water method. METHODS: This prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 40 patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1-5 with the objective of validating two physical activity questionnaires: the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) and the Stanford 7-day recall questionnaire. TEE was measured using doubly-labelled water technique. TEE was also estimated using predicted resting energy expenditure and estimated physical activity measures from the questionnaires. RESULTS: Measured TEE correlated better with TEE estimated from RPAQ compared to that from the Stanford questionnaire. In Bland-Altman analysis, TEE estimated from RPAQ had the least bias and narrower limits of agreement compared to the measured TEE. A metabolic equivalent of task value of 1.3 for the unaccounted time in RPAQ provided the best approximation of estimated TEE to the measured TEE. CONCLUSIONS: RPAQ is an acceptable questionnaire tool for assessing physical activity level in patients with chronic kidney disease.en
dc.format.extent8
dc.format.extent347817
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectBody Mass Index
dc.subjectBody Weight
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectEnergy Metabolism
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMotor Activity
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectRenal Insufficiency, Chronic
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectWater
dc.titleComparison of energy estimates in chronic kidney disease using doubly-labelled wateren
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Postgraduate Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionBasic and Clinical Science Unit
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2016-07-15
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jhn.12326
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record