Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSridharan, S
dc.contributor.authorWong, J
dc.contributor.authorVilar, E
dc.contributor.authorFarrington, K
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-22T13:04:07Z
dc.date.available2017-08-22T13:04:07Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-27
dc.identifier.citationSridharan , S , Wong , J , Vilar , E & Farrington , K 2016 , ' Comparison of energy estimates in chronic kidney disease using doubly-labelled water ' , Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics , vol. 29 , no. 1 , pp. 59-66 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12326
dc.identifier.issn0952-3871
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19251
dc.descriptionThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: S. Sridharan, J. Wong, E. Vilar, and K. Farrington, ‘Comparison of energy estimates in chronic kidney disease using doubly-labelled water’, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol. 29 (1): 59-66, February 2016, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12326. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. © 2015 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Total energy expenditure (TEE) is estimated in clinical practice as a combined measure of resting energy expenditure and physical activity level. Commonly available questionnaires to estimate physical activity level have not been validated in patients with kidney disease using the doubly-labelled water method. METHODS: This prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 40 patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1-5 with the objective of validating two physical activity questionnaires: the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) and the Stanford 7-day recall questionnaire. TEE was measured using doubly-labelled water technique. TEE was also estimated using predicted resting energy expenditure and estimated physical activity measures from the questionnaires. RESULTS: Measured TEE correlated better with TEE estimated from RPAQ compared to that from the Stanford questionnaire. In Bland-Altman analysis, TEE estimated from RPAQ had the least bias and narrower limits of agreement compared to the measured TEE. A metabolic equivalent of task value of 1.3 for the unaccounted time in RPAQ provided the best approximation of estimated TEE to the measured TEE. CONCLUSIONS: RPAQ is an acceptable questionnaire tool for assessing physical activity level in patients with chronic kidney disease.en
dc.format.extent8
dc.format.extent347817
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectBody Mass Index
dc.subjectBody Weight
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectEnergy Metabolism
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMotor Activity
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectRenal Insufficiency, Chronic
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectWater
dc.titleComparison of energy estimates in chronic kidney disease using doubly-labelled wateren
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Postgraduate Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionBasic and Clinical Science Unit
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2016-07-15
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jhn.12326
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record