Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcDougall, Kirsty
dc.contributor.authorNolan, Francis
dc.contributor.authorHudson, Toby
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-04T17:03:09Z
dc.date.available2017-09-04T17:03:09Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-01
dc.identifier.citationMcDougall , K , Nolan , F & Hudson , T 2016 , ' Telephone transmission and earwitnesses: performance on voice parades controlled for voice similarity ' , Phonetica , vol. 72 , no. 4 , pp. 257-272 . https://doi.org/10.1159/000439385
dc.identifier.issn0031-8388
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 10520431
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: de5f81b8-62aa-4b1e-8a7a-a451f4456dcb
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84949546260
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19309
dc.descriptionMcDougall K., Nolan F., Hudson T., 'Telephone Transmission and Earwitnesses: Performance on Voice Parades Controlled for Voice Similarity', Phonetica, Vol. 72 (4): 257-272, February 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000439385.
dc.description.abstractThe effect of telephone transmission on a listener's ability to recognise a speaker in a voice parade is investigated. A hundred listeners (25 per condition) heard 1 of 5 ‘target' voices, then returned a week later for a voice parade. The 4 conditions were: target exposure and parade both at studio quality; exposure and parade both at telephone quality; studio exposure with telephone parade, and vice versa. Fewer correct identifications followed from telephone exposure and parade (64%) than from studio exposure and parade (76%). Fewer still resulted for studio exposure/telephone parade (60%) and, dramatically, only 32% for telephone exposure/studio parade. Certain speakers were identified more readily than others across all conditions. Confidence ratings reflected this effect of speaker, but not the effect of exposure/parade condition.en
dc.format.extent17
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhonetica
dc.titleTelephone transmission and earwitnesses: performance on voice parades controlled for voice similarityen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Humanities
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Humanities
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-02-01
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1159/000439385
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record