Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEdbrooke-Childs, Julian
dc.contributor.authorBarry, David
dc.contributor.authorMateos Rodriguez, Irene
dc.contributor.authorPapageorgiou, Danae
dc.contributor.authorWolpert, Miranda
dc.contributor.authorSchulz, Joerg
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-27T10:37:37Z
dc.date.available2017-09-27T10:37:37Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-19
dc.identifier.citationEdbrooke-Childs , J , Barry , D , Mateos Rodriguez , I , Papageorgiou , D , Wolpert , M & Schulz , J 2017 , ' Patient reported outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services: Associations between clinician demographic characteristics, attitudes, and efficacy ' , Child and Adolescent Mental Health , vol. 22 , no. 1 , pp. 36-41 . https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12189
dc.identifier.issn1475-357X
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 10180240
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 1b22809d-30c6-47a4-aaf4-729a727b799f
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84995467800
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19445
dc.descriptionThis article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. © 2016 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.description.abstractBackground Policy recommends using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), yet their use is persistently low. Our aim was to examine the association between PROM use and clinician demographic characteristics, attitudes and efficacy. Method A sample of N = 109 clinicians completed an online survey. Results Clinicians who reported higher levels of use of cognitive behaviour or humanistic approaches had higher levels of PROM use than clinicians who reported lower levels of use of these approaches. Clinicians who reported having received training had higher levels of self-efficacy regarding PROMs than clinicians who reported not having received training, but the effects of training on PROM attitudes and use were not significant. Still, clinicians with more positive attitudes or self-efficacy regarding PROMs had higher levels of PROM use than clinicians with less positive attitudes or self-efficacy regarding PROMs. Conclusion Clinicians should be supported to have the knowledge, skills and confidence to effectively use PROMs in their clinical practice.en
dc.format.extent6
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofChild and Adolescent Mental Health
dc.subjectoutcome
dc.subjectPROMS
dc.subjectintervention
dc.subjectchildren
dc.titlePatient reported outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services: Associations between clinician demographic characteristics, attitudes, and efficacyen
dc.contributor.institutionPsychology
dc.contributor.institutionCognitive Neuropsychology
dc.contributor.institutionHealth and Clinical Psychology group
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology and Sports Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Psychology and Sport Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-10-14
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12189
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record