Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGutierrez, Mauricio D.
dc.contributor.authorTenentes, Vasileios
dc.contributor.authorRossi, Daniele
dc.contributor.authorKazmierski, Tom J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-24T15:52:42Z
dc.date.available2017-10-24T15:52:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-20
dc.identifier.citationGutierrez , M D , Tenentes , V , Rossi , D & Kazmierski , T J 2017 , ' Susceptible Workload Evaluation and Protection using Selective Fault Tolerance ' , Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications (JETTA) , vol. 33 , no. 4 , pp. 463-477 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-017-5668-7
dc.identifier.issn0923-8174
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 12471408
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 2647062b-db31-40df-9d0b-705d1a6c50cc
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85021176608
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19477
dc.descriptionThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International License CC-BY 4.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
dc.description.abstractLow power fault tolerance design techniques trade reliability to reduce the area cost and the power overhead of integrated circuits by protecting only a subset of their workload or their most vulnerable parts. However, in the presence of faults not all workloads are equally susceptible to errors. In this paper, we present a low power fault tolerance design technique that selects and protects the most susceptible workload. We propose to rank the workload susceptibility as the likelihood of any error to bypass the logic masking of the circuit and propagate to its outputs. The susceptible workload is protected by a partial Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) scheme. We evaluate the proposed technique on timing-independent and timing-dependent errors induced by permanent and transient faults. In comparison with unranked selective fault tolerance approach, we demonstrate a) a similar error coverage with a 39.7% average reduction of the area overhead or b) a 86.9% average error coverage improvement for a similar area overhead. For the same area overhead case, we observe an error coverage improvement of 53.1% and 53.5% against permanent stuck-at and transition faults, respectively, and an average error coverage improvement of 151.8% and 89.0% against timing-dependent and timing-independent transient faults, respectively. Compared to TMR, the proposed technique achieves an area and power overhead reduction of 145.8% to 182.0%.en
dc.format.extent15
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications (JETTA)
dc.subjectSelective fault tolerance
dc.subjectWorkload susceptibility analysis
dc.subjectSusceptible workload
dc.subjectOutput deviations
dc.subjectPermanent faults
dc.subjectTransient Faults
dc.titleSusceptible Workload Evaluation and Protection using Selective Fault Toleranceen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Engineering and Technology
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-017-5668-7
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record