Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarr, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Danielle
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-07T17:38:51Z
dc.date.available2017-12-07T17:38:51Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-28
dc.identifier.citationCarr , C & Adams , D 2017 , ' The implications of the Montgomery judgment on pharmacy practice and patients with learning disability ' , The Pharmaceutical Journal . https://doi.org/10.1211/CP.2017.20203788
dc.identifier.issn0031-6873
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 12848039
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: db4c2f30-bcaa-4141-9be1-0b853add403a
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7449-4531/work/62748517
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19591
dc.descriptionDanielle Adams and Claudia Carr, 'The implications of the Montgomery judgment on pharmacy practice and patients with learning disability', the Pharmaceutical Journal, Clinical Pharmacist, CP November 2017 online, online | DOI: 10.1211/CP.2017.20203788. Copyright Royal Pharmaceutical Society 2017.
dc.description.abstractThe judgment in Montgomery v Lanarkshire (Scotland) 2015 introduced a new definition of informed consent which has implications for all healthcare professionals. This article focuses specifically on the implications for pharmacy practice and patients with learning disability. During consultations, both pharmacist prescribers and non-prescribing pharmacists must adhere to the provisions of the judgment to ensure patients provide informed consent. Particular issues arise where patients with learning disability are concerned because the Accessible Information Standard (AIS), which came into force in England in August 2016, must also be considered. Consequently, easy-read material should also be of a standard and quality relevant to that particular individual. In addition, this article will briefly consider whether information should always be disclosed.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Pharmaceutical Journal
dc.subjectAccessible Information Standard, easy-read material, informed consent, learning disability, Montgomery v Lanarkshire, pharmacy practice, therapeutic exception
dc.titleThe implications of the Montgomery judgment on pharmacy practice and patients with learning disabilityen
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Law School
dc.contributor.institutionLaw
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/research/perspective-article/the-implications-of-the-montgomery-judgment-on-pharmacy-practice-and-patients-with-learning-disability/20203788.article
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1211/CP.2017.20203788
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record