Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKumaran, Binoy
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Tim
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T17:33:26Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T17:33:26Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-09
dc.identifier.citationKumaran , B & Watson , T 2016 , ' Radiofrequency-based treatment in therapy-related clinical practice – a narrative review. Part II: chronic conditions ' , Physical Therapy Reviews , vol. 20 , no. 5-6 , pp. 325-343 . https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2015.1133034
dc.identifier.issn1083-3196
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 10011641
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: bc90b4f9-70ef-428d-a33c-104b3759647d
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85024092196
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-3125-0902/work/83087684
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19722
dc.descriptionThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Physical Therapy Review on 9 February 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10833196.2015.1133034.
dc.description.abstractBackground: Radiofrequency (RF)-based electrophysical agents (EPAs) have been employed in therapy related clinical practice for several decades. They are used to reduce pain and inflammation and promote tissue healing. Although deemed less popular in current therapy practice, surveys suggest that some of these EPAs are still used reasonably widely. Objective: To review the evidence for the use of non-invasive low-frequency RFs (30kHz - 30 MHz) for treating chronic therapy-related clinical conditions. Major findings: All relevant peer-reviewed clinical studies published in English, concerning low-frequency RFs were sought. Identified literature was stratified as ‘acute’ and ‘chronic’ based on their clinical area. The studies on chronic conditions were reviewed for this paper and analysed to assess the volume and scope of current evidence. Out of 120 studies identified, 90 related to chronic conditions. The majority of them (82 studies) employed shortwave therapy (SWT) in continuous (CSWT) or pulsed (PSWT) modes. Only eight studies employed frequencies other than shortwave. Overall 67 studies investigated conditions relating to ‘pain and inflammation’, 16 to ‘tissue healing’ and 7 studies to other less reported conditions. Conclusions: Evidence favouring and against RF-based EPAs is available. There is moderate evidence favouring the use of SWT (mainly PSWT) in knee osteoarthritis. Some evidence also exists for CSWT in chronic low back pain and PSWT for treating chronic wounds. Evidence for other conditions is insufficient and conflicting. A general lack of research emphasis in the non-shortwave RF band is evident. Further and wider research in this area is necessary.en
dc.format.extent19
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhysical Therapy Reviews
dc.subjectchronic conditions
dc.subjectclinical effects
dc.subjectelectrophysical agents
dc.subjectnon-invasive
dc.subjectradiofrequency
dc.titleRadiofrequency-based treatment in therapy-related clinical practice – a narrative review. Part II: chronic conditionsen
dc.contributor.institutionAllied Health Professions
dc.contributor.institutionPhysiotherapy
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Allied Health Professions and Midwifery
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-02-09
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2015.1133034
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record