Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClegg, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorAlmack, Kathryn
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-07T17:43:50Z
dc.date.available2018-02-07T17:43:50Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-31
dc.identifier.citationClegg , J , Murray , E & Almack , K 2017 , ' Liberal Individualism and Deleuzean Relationality in Intellectual Disability ' , Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology , vol. 24 , no. 4 . https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2017.0053
dc.identifier.issn1086-3303
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 12614090
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: bfdba54e-487c-489d-a1a8-4898914be040
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85039550155
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19748
dc.descriptionThis document is the Accepted Manuscript version of the following article: Jennifer Clegg, Elizabeth Murphy, and Kathryn Almack, ‘Liberal Individualism and Deleuzean Relationality in Intellectual Disability’, Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, Vol. 24 (4): 359-372, December 2017. The final, definitive version is available online at DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2017.0053, published by John Hopkins University Press.
dc.description.abstractSuccessful critiques of health policies for people with impaired cognition identify a need for alternatives that go beyond individualism. ‘Choice’ policy was examined as young people with severe intellectual disabilities moved from special schools to adult services. We draw on three cases from a longitudinal cohort study to examine the way decisions with and for these young people were made and accounted for. It was not a simple matter of parents and transition workers hearing about these young people’s choices and facilitating what they wanted. The data raise questions about discourses of choice in ID when referring to people with severe intellectual disabilities: Few ‘choices’ could be considered informed nor made by young people with capacity to make them and many decisions were informed by other ethics. Findings were interpreted through a Deleuzean ethical–relational lens. We identify implications for theory and practice to show how Deleuzean thinking can reinvigorate intellectual disability.en
dc.format.extent33
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology
dc.rights/dk/atira/pure/core/openaccesspermission/open
dc.titleLiberal Individualism and Deleuzean Relationality in Intellectual Disabilityen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care
dc.contributor.institutionHealth, Young People and Family Lives
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.description.versiontypeFinal Accepted Version
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-26
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2017.0053
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.rights.accesstypeopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record