Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPattison, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorO'Gara, Geraldine
dc.contributor.authorWigmore, Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-12T18:06:31Z
dc.date.available2018-02-12T18:06:31Z
dc.date.issued2015-05-01
dc.identifier.citationPattison , N , O'Gara , G & Wigmore , T 2015 , ' Negotiating Transitions : Involvement of Critical Care Outreach Teams in End-of-Life Decision Making ' , American Journal of Critical Care , vol. 24 , no. 3 , pp. 232-40 . https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2015715
dc.identifier.issn1062-3264
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 12852619
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 16213289-9aa1-4f89-b4f2-7dc28185c6a1
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 25934720
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84930018654
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-6771-8733/work/62751777
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/19767
dc.description©2015 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Little research has examined the involvement of critical care outreach teams in end-of-life decision making. OBJECTIVE: To establish how much time critical care outreach teams spend with patients who are subsequently subject to limitation of medical treatment and end-of-life decisions and how much influence the teams have on those decisions. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review, with qualitative analysis, in a large cancer center. Data from all patients referred emergently for critical care outreach from October 2010 to October 2011 who later had limitation of medical treatment or end-of-life care were retrieved. Findings were analyzed by using SPSS 19 and qualitative free-text analysis. RESULTS: Of 890 patients referred for critical care outreach from October 2010 to October 2011, 377 were referred as an emergency; 108 of those had limitation of medical treatment and were included in the review. Thirty-five patients (32.4%) died while hospitalized. As a result of outreach intervention and a decision to limit medical treatment, 56 (51.9%) of the 108 patients received a formal end-of-life care plan (including care pathways, referral to palliative care team, hospice). About a fifth (21.5%) of clinical contact time is being spent on patients who subsequently are subject to limitation of medical treatment. Qualitative document analysis showed 5 emerging themes: difficulty of discussions about not attempting cardiopulmonary resuscitation, complexities in coordinating multiple teams, delays in referral and decision making, decision reversals and opaque decision making, and technical versus ethical imperatives. CONCLUSION: A considerable amount of time is being spent on these emergency referrals, and decisions to limit medical treatment are common. The appropriateness of escalation of levels of care is often not questioned until patients become critically or acutely unwell, and outreach teams subsequently intervene.en
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Critical Care
dc.subjectCritical Care
dc.subjectDecision Making
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectKaplan-Meier Estimate
dc.subjectPalliative Care
dc.subjectPatient Care Team
dc.subjectReferral and Consultation
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectTerminal Care
dc.subjectJournal Article
dc.subjectResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.titleNegotiating Transitions : Involvement of Critical Care Outreach Teams in End-of-Life Decision Makingen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Adult Nursing and Primary Care
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Applied Clinical, Health and Care Research (CACHE)
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionP
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2015715
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record