The Expert Patients Programme: a paradox of patient empowerment and medical dominance
Author
Wilson, P.M.
Kendall, S.
Brooks, F.
Attention
2299/1979
Abstract
Self-care is seen as a key element in managing resource demand in chronic disease and is also perceived as an empowering right for patients. The Chronic Disease Self-Management Programme developed in the USA has been adopted in a number of countries and in the UK has been as adapted as the Expert Patients Programme. However, despite its potential as a layled empowering initiative, the Expert Patients Programme has been criticised as perpetuating the medical model and failing to reach those in most need. This paper revisits a critique of the Expert Patients Programme, and drawing upon a qualitative study seeks to explore whether the Expert Patients Programme enables empowerment or replicates traditional patterns of the patient–professional relationship. A grounded-theory approach was adopted utilising focus groups, in-depth interviews and participant observation. Data were analysed through the constant comparative method and the development of codes and categories. Conducted in the relatively affluent area of the south-east of England, this paper draws on data from 66 individuals with a chronic illness who were knowledgeable, active and informed. The study revealed a number of characteristics common to expert patients that were linked to a systematic, proactive and organised approach to self-management, a clear communication style and the ability to compartmentalise emotion. The study included participant observation of an Expert Patients Programme and a professional-led self-management course. The paradoxical nature of the Expert Patients Programme was revealed, for whilst there was evidence that it reinforced the medical paradigm, there was a concurrent acknowledgement and support for the subjective experience of living with a long-term condition. Furthermore, whilst the policy emphasis has been on individual empowerment within the Expert Patients Programme, there is some evidence that it may be triggering a health consumer movement.
Publication date
2007Published in
Health & Social Care in the CommunityPublished version
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00701.xOther links
http://hdl.handle.net/2299/1979Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Participatory co-design and normalisation process theory with staff and patients to implement digital ways of working into routine care : the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in UK renal services
Knowles, Sarah; Ercia, A; Caskey, F; Rees, M; Farrington, K; Van der Veer, S N (2021-07-18)BACKGROUND: Successful implementation of digital health systems requires contextually sensitive solutions. Working directly with system users and drawing on implementation science frameworks are both recommended. We sought ... -
Predicted estimates of resting energy expenditure have limited clinical utility in patients with cirrhosis: an individual patient data analysis
Limon-Miro, Ana Teresa; Jackson, Clive Douglas; Eslamparast, Tannaz; Yamanaka-Okumura, Hisami; Plank, Lindsay Dudley; Henry, Christiani Jeyakumar; Madden, Angela; Ferreira, Livia Garcia; Kalaitzakis, Evangelos; Prieto de Frías, César; Knudsen, Anne Wilkens; Gramlich, Leah; Raman, Maitreyi; Alberda, Cathy; Belland, Dawn; Den Heyer, Vanessa; Tandon, Puneeta; Morgan, Marsha Yvonne (2022-01-26)Background & Aim: Malnutrition is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. Accurate assessment of energy requirements is needed to optimize dietary intake. Resting energy expenditure (REE), the ... -
Ambulance clinicians’ attitudes to older patients’ self‐determination when the patient has impaired decision‐making ability: A Delphi study
Svensson, Anders; Bremer, Anders; Rantala, Andreas; Andersson, Henrik; Devenish, Scott; Williams, Julia; Holmberg, Mats (2021-09-12)Abstract: Objective: The proportion of older people is increasing and reflects in the demand on ambulance services (AS). Patients can be more vulnerable and increasingly dependent, especially when their decision‐making ...