Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorXanthopoulou, Ermioni
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-30T18:08:18Z
dc.date.available2018-04-30T18:08:18Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-30
dc.identifier.citationXanthopoulou , E 2018 , ' Mutual trust and rights in EU criminal and asylum law: Three phases of evolution and the uncharted territory beyond blind trust ' , Common Market Law Review , vol. 55 , no. 2 , pp. 489-509 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 13466500
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 38f0f714-7d4a-4b9c-8acb-c78fdffdc150
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85044942456
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/20006
dc.descriptionThis document is an Accepted Manuscript, reprinted from Common Market Law Review, Vol. 55 (2): 489-509, April 2018, with permission of Kluwer Law International. Under embargo until 31 July 2018.
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the evolving relationship of mutual trust and fundamental rights in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. The ECJ has long prioritized the effectiveness of instruments based on mutual trust through an unimpeded system of mutual recognition. Arguments based on a violation of fundamental rights were taken to contradict the presumption of compliance, refute mutual trust, and hinder automatic mutual recognition. The ECJ has now accepted, both in criminal and asylum law, that the presumption of compliance is not conclusive and mutual trust is not blind. The article observes an emergent, but carefully controlled dynamic of rights-based assessment through case-by-case analysis, illustrating three phases of mutual trust, but argues that this dynamic is slow, unclear and inadequate. It suggests that national authorities should take a proactive role, promoting real and constructive relationships of trust, allowing an individual assessment of rights violations via rights-based review. The latter is based on a proper understanding of trust, as an evolving concept based on evidence. Respect for rights, terminological clarity, enhanced judicial communication, and acknowledgment of shared values are the way forward.en
dc.format.extent21
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCommon Market Law Review
dc.rightsEmbargoed
dc.subjectEuropean Arrest Warrant; fundamental rights; mutual recognition; proportionality; Radu; Melloni
dc.subjectDublin III Regulation
dc.subjectfundamental rights
dc.subjectmutual trust
dc.subjectmutual recognition
dc.titleMutual trust and rights in EU criminal and asylum law: Three phases of evolution and the uncharted territory beyond blind trusten
dc.contributor.institutionLaw
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Law School
dc.contributor.institutionSecurity and Governance Research Group
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-07-31
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044942456&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2018034
dc.relation.schoolHertfordshire Law School
dc.description.versiontypeFinal Accepted Version
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-04-30
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-07-31
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.date.embargo2018-07-31
herts.rights.accesstypeEmbargoed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record