Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOkamoto, Ikumi
dc.contributor.authorTonkin-Crine, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorRayner, Hugh
dc.contributor.authorMurtagh, Fliss E M
dc.contributor.authorFarrington, Ken
dc.contributor.authorCaskey, Fergus
dc.contributor.authorTomson, Charles
dc.contributor.authorLoud, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, Roger
dc.contributor.authorO'Donoghue, Donal J
dc.contributor.authorRoderick, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-17T15:38:24Z
dc.date.available2018-05-17T15:38:24Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-07
dc.identifier.citationOkamoto , I , Tonkin-Crine , S , Rayner , H , Murtagh , F E M , Farrington , K , Caskey , F , Tomson , C , Loud , F , Greenwood , R , O'Donoghue , D J & Roderick , P 2015 , ' Conservative care for ESRD in the United Kingdom : a national survey ' , Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (CJASN) , vol. 10 , no. 1 , pp. 120-6 . https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.05000514
dc.identifier.issn1555-9041
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 13324594
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 17c96f19-83e0-4af9-8880-da7d8bb4a931
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 25388518
dc.identifier.otherPubMedCentral: PMC4284415
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84923931010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/20052
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2015 by the American Society of Nephrology.
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conservative kidney management (CKM) has been developed in the United Kingdom (UK) as an alternative to dialysis for older patients with stage 5 CKD (CKD5) and multiple comorbidities. This national survey sought to describe the current scale and pattern of delivery of conservative care in UK renal units and identify their priorities for its future development. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A survey on practice patterns of CKM for patients age 75 and older with CKD5 was sent to clinical directors of all 71 adult renal units in the UK in March 2013. RESULTS: Sixty-seven units (94%) responded. All but one unit reported providing CKM for some patients. Terminology varied, although "conservative management" was the most frequently used term (46%). Lack of an agreed-upon definition of when a patient is receiving CKM made it difficult to obtain meaningful data on the numbers of such patients. Fifty-two percent provided the number of CKM patients age ≥ 75 years in 2012; the median was 45 per unit (interquartile range [IQR], 20-83). The median number of symptomatic CKM patients who would otherwise have started dialysis was eight (IQR, 4.5-22). CKM practice patterns varied: 35% had a written guideline, 23% had dedicated CKM clinics, 45% had dedicated staff, and 50% provided staff training on CKM. Most units (88%) provided primary care clinicians with information/advice regarding CKM. Eighty percent identified a need for better evidence comparing outcomes on CKM versus dialysis, and 65% considered it appropriate to enter patients into a randomized trial. CONCLUSIONS: CKM is provided in almost all UK renal units, but scale and organization vary widely. Lack of common terminology and definitions hinders the development and assessment of CKM. Many survey respondents expressed support for further research comparing outcomes with conservative care versus dialysis.en
dc.format.extent7
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (CJASN)
dc.subjectAge Factors
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectComorbidity
dc.subjectCritical Pathways
dc.subjectDecision Support Techniques
dc.subjectDelivery of Health Care, Integrated
dc.subjectHealth Care Surveys
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInterdisciplinary Communication
dc.subjectKidney Failure, Chronic
dc.subjectPalliative Care
dc.subjectPatient Care Team
dc.subjectPatient Selection
dc.subjectPractice Patterns, Physicians'
dc.subjectProcess Assessment (Health Care)
dc.subjectSeverity of Illness Index
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.subjectJournal Article
dc.titleConservative care for ESRD in the United Kingdom : a national surveyen
dc.contributor.institutionBasic and Clinical Science Unit
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Health Services and Clinical Research
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Postgraduate Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.05000514
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record