Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarr, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Nina
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-04T16:43:03Z
dc.date.available2018-06-04T16:43:03Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-23
dc.identifier.citationCarr , C & Barnett , N 2018 , ' The Montgomery judgement and pharmacist consultations ' , The Prescriber , vol. 29 , no. 1 . https://doi.org/10.1002/psb.1639
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 13381297
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 3fb79c26-5381-4389-8a7f-27ebd2b0c9e0
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7449-4531/work/62748507
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/20113
dc.description.abstractThere is little awareness among pharmacists of the existence of the Montgomery judgment or its potential implications for medicines‐related consultations. Nina Barnett and Claudia Carr therefore undertook a survey of pharmacists in England to create a baseline for current knowledge about informed consent in the context of medicines‐related consultations.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Prescriber
dc.titleThe Montgomery judgement and pharmacist consultationsen
dc.contributor.institutionLaw
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Law School
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolHertfordshire Law School
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-23
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1002/psb.1639
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record