Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarr, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Nina
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-04T16:43:03Z
dc.date.available2018-06-04T16:43:03Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-23
dc.identifier.citationCarr , C & Barnett , N 2018 , ' The Montgomery judgement and pharmacist consultations ' , The Prescriber , vol. 29 , no. 1 . https://doi.org/10.1002/psb.1639
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 13381297
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 3fb79c26-5381-4389-8a7f-27ebd2b0c9e0
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7449-4531/work/62748507
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/20113
dc.description.abstractThere is little awareness among pharmacists of the existence of the Montgomery judgment or its potential implications for medicines‐related consultations. Nina Barnett and Claudia Carr therefore undertook a survey of pharmacists in England to create a baseline for current knowledge about informed consent in the context of medicines‐related consultations.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Prescriber
dc.titleThe Montgomery judgement and pharmacist consultationsen
dc.contributor.institutionLaw
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Law School
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1002/psb.1639
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record