Dementia case-finding in hospitals: a qualitative study exploring the views of healthcare professionals in English primary care and secondary care
Author
Burn, Anne-Marie
Fleming, Jane
Brayne, Carol
Fox, Chris
Bunn, Frances
Attention
2299/20203
Abstract
Objectives In 2012-2013, the English National Health Service mandated hospitals to conduct systematic case-finding of people with dementia among older people with unplanned admissions. The method was not defined. The aim of this study was to understand current approaches to dementia case-finding in acute hospitals in England and explore the views of healthcare professionals on perceived benefits and challenges. Design Qualitative study involving interviews, focus groups and thematic content analysis. Setting Primary care and secondary care across six counties in the East of England. Participants Hospital staff involved in dementia case-finding and primary care staff in the catchment areas of those hospitals. Results We recruited 23 hospital staff and 36 primary care staff, including 30 general practitioners (GPs). Analysis resulted in three themes: (1) lack of consistent approaches in case-finding processes, (2) barriers between primary care and secondary care which impact on case-finding outcomes and (3) perceptions of rationale, aims and impacts of case-finding. The study shows that there were variations in how well hospitals recorded and reported outcomes to GPs. Barriers between primary care and secondary care, including GPs' lack of access to hospital investigations and lack of clarity about roles and responsibilities, impacted case-finding outcomes. Staff in secondary care were more positive about the initiative than primary care staff, and there were conflicting priorities for primary care and secondary care regarding case-finding. Conclusions The study suggests a more evidence-based approach was needed to justify approaches to dementia case-finding. Information communicated to primary care from hospitals needs to be comprehensive, appropriate and consistent before GPs can effectively plan further investigation, treatment or care. Follow-up in primary care further requires access to options for postdiagnostic support. There is a need to evaluate the outcomes for patients and the economic impact on health and care services across settings.
Publication date
2018-03-17Published in
BMJ OpenPublished version
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020521Other links
http://hdl.handle.net/2299/20203Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mapping staff perspectives towards the delivery of hospital care for children and young people with and without learning disabilities in England : A mixed methods national study
Oulton, Kate; Gibson, Faith; Carr, Lucinda; Hassiotis, Angela; Jewitt, Carey; Kenten, Charlotte; Russell, Jessica; Whiting, Mark; Tuffrey-Wijne, Irene; Wray, Jo (2018-03-23)Background: Children and young people (CYP) with learning disabilities (LD) are a vulnerable population with increased risk of abuse and accidental injury and whose parents have reported concerns about the quality, safety ... -
Workplace bullying from the perspectives of trainee Clinical Psychologists
Brown, Lan Rachel; Mason, Barbara; Carter, Madeline (2021-01-22)Purpose: Research has identified that workplace bullying is a significant problem within health care, with health-care trainees at particular risk. The purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of workplace ... -
The Health and Wellbeing of Female Street Sex Workers
Elliott, Nalishebo (2017-11-10)Previous research on female street sex workers (FSSWs) has primarily concentrated on the stigmatisation of women’s involvement in the sex industry particularly with reference to the spread of HIV/AIDS. The response of the ...