Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFoerster, Frank
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Joe
dc.contributor.authorNehaniv, Chrystopher
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-16T00:10:46Z
dc.date.available2018-08-16T00:10:46Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-01
dc.identifier.citationFoerster , F , Saunders , J & Nehaniv , C 2018 , ' Robots that Say ‘No’. Affective Symbol Grounding and the Case of Intent Interpretations ' , IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems , vol. 10 , no. 3 , 8120012 , pp. 530 - 544 . https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2017.2752366
dc.identifier.issn2379-8920
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 11099490
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 931a95a9-2a4b-4bcd-96e1-500b0ceaf8d1
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85035798079
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/20358
dc.description© 2017 IEEE. This article has been accepted for publication in a forthcoming issue of IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works.
dc.description.abstractModern theories on early child language acquisition tend to focus on referential words, mostly nouns, labeling concrete objects, or physical properties. In this experimental proof-of-concept study, we show how nonreferential negation words, typically belonging to a child's first ten words, may be acquired. A child-like humanoid robot is deployed in speech-wise unconstrained interaction with naïve human participants. In agreement with psycholinguistic observations, we corroborate the hypothesis that affect plays a pivotal role in the socially distributed acquisition process where the adept conversation partner provides linguistic interpretations of the affective displays of the less adept speaker. Negation words are prosodically salient within intent interpretations that are triggered by the learner's display of affect. From there they can be picked up and used by the budding language learner which may involve the grounding of these words in the very affective states that triggered them in the first place. The pragmatic analysis of the robot's linguistic performance indicates that the correct timing of negative utterances is essential for the listener to infer the meaning of otherwise ambiguous negative utterances. In order to assess the robot's performance thoroughly comparative data from psycholinguistic studies of parent-child dyads is needed highlighting the need for further interdisciplinary work.en
dc.format.extent15
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems
dc.rightsOpen
dc.subjectDevelopmental robotics
dc.subjecthuman-robot interaction
dc.subjectlanguage acquisition
dc.subjectnegation
dc.subjectpragmatics
dc.subjectpsycholinguistics
dc.subjectsocial robotics
dc.subjectSoftware
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligence
dc.titleRobots that Say ‘No’. Affective Symbol Grounding and the Case of Intent Interpretationsen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionAdaptive Systems
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Computer Science and Informatics Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035798079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Computer Science
dc.description.versiontypeFinal Published version
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-09-01
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2017.2752366
rioxxterms.licenseref.uriOther
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.rights.accesstypeOpen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record