Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHoulbrook, Ceri
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-16T00:10:54Z
dc.date.available2018-08-16T00:10:54Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-30
dc.identifier.citationHoulbrook , C 2017 , ' Lessons from Love-Locks: The archaeology of a contemporary assemblage ' , Journal of Material Culture . https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183517745715
dc.identifier.issn1460-3586
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 11120764
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 7a4b63d7-1f6f-40e7-aafc-c94f1f29ec15
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85048370668
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/20360
dc.descriptionThis document is the Accepted Manuscript version. The final, definitive version of this paper has been published in Journal of Material Culture, November 2017, published by SAGE Publishing, All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstractLoss of context is a challenge, if not the bane, of the ritual archaeologist’s craft. Those who research ritual frequently encounter difficulties in the interpretation of its often tantalisingly incomplete material record. Careful analysis of material remains may afford us glimpses into past ritual activity, but our often vast chronological separation from the ritual practitioners themselves prevent us from seeing the whole picture. The archaeologist engaging with structured deposits, for instance, is often forced to study ritual assemblages post-accumulation. Many nuances of its formation, therefore, may be lost in interpretation. This paper considers what insights an archaeologist could gain into the place, people, pace, and purpose of deposition by recording an accumulation of structured deposits during its formation, rather than after. To answer this, the paper will focus on a contemporary depositional practice: the love-lock. This custom involves the inscribing of names/initials onto a padlock, its attachment to a bridge or other public structure, and the deposition of the corresponding key into the water below; a ritual often enacted by a couple as a statement of their romantic commitment. Drawing on empirical data from a three-year diachronic site-specific investigation into a love-lock bridge in Manchester, UK, the author demonstrates the value of contemporary archaeology in engaging with the often enigmatic material culture of ritual accumulations.en
dc.format.extent25
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Material Culture
dc.rightsOpen
dc.subjectcontemporary archaeology
dc.subjectlove-locks
dc.subjectritual accumulation
dc.subjectstructured deposit
dc.titleLessons from Love-Locks: The archaeology of a contemporary assemblageen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Humanities
dc.contributor.institutionHistory
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Humanities
dc.description.versiontypeFinal Accepted Version
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-11-30
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1359183517745715
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.rights.accesstypeOpen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record