Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDiPompeo, M.~A.
dc.contributor.authorHickox, R.~C.
dc.contributor.authorMyers, A.~D.
dc.contributor.authorGeach, J.~E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-13T12:15:08Z
dc.date.available2019-02-13T12:15:08Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-21
dc.identifier.citationDiPompeo , M A , Hickox , R C , Myers , A D & Geach , J E 2017 , ' A unifying evolutionary framework for infrared-selected obscured and unobscured quasar host haloes ' , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , vol. 464 , no. 3 , pp. 3526-3535 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2589
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 16294630
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 964b65c1-ac1f-4e72-81ab-b5562fdf6d7d
dc.identifier.otherBibtex: urn:30deddb7729653641d01d7d3a15e893e
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85015899567
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/21067
dc.description© 2016 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.
dc.description.abstractRecent measurements of the dark matter halo masses of infrared-selected obscured quasars are in tension – some indicate that obscured quasars have a higher halo mass compared to their unobscured counterparts, while others find no difference. The former result is inconsistent with the simplest models of quasar unification which rely solely on the viewing angle, while the latter may support such models. Here, using empirical relationships between dark matter halo and supermassive black hole (BH) masses, we provide a simple evolutionary picture which naturally explains these findings and is motivated by more sophisticated merger-driven quasar-fuelling models. The model tracks the growth rate of haloes, with the BH growing in spurts of quasar activity in order to ‘catch up’ with the Mbh–Mstellar–Mhalo relationship. The first part of the quasar phase is obscured and is followed by an unobscured phase. Depending on the luminosity limit of the sample, driven by observational selection effects, a difference in halo masses may or may not be significant. For high-luminosity samples, the difference can be large (a few to 10 times higher masses in obscured quasars), while for lower luminosity samples, the halo mass difference is very small, much smaller than current observational constraints. Such a simple model provides a qualitative explanation for the higher mass haloes of obscured quasars, as well as a rough quantitative agreement with seemingly disparate results.en
dc.format.extent10
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
dc.subjectgalaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, quasars: general, quasars: supermassive black holes
dc.titleA unifying evolutionary framework for infrared-selected obscured and unobscured quasar host haloesen
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Astrophysics Research
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2589
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record