Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorColeman, Sam
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-19T10:14:11Z
dc.date.available2019-02-19T10:14:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-28
dc.identifier.citationColeman , S 2018 , ' The Merits of Higher-Order Thought Theories ' , Transformação: Revista de Filosofia , vol. 41 , no. 1 , pp. 31-48 . https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2018.v41esp.04.p31
dc.identifier.issn0101-3173
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 16319448
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 2eadd206-0ed6-4776-93c7-c5c2678eb68d
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85063108607
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/21104
dc.description.abstractOver many years and in many publications David Rosenthal has developed, defended and applied his justly well-known higher-order thought theory of consciousness. In this paper I explain the theory, then provide a brief history of a major objection to it. I suggest that this objection is ultimately ineffectual, but that behind it lies a reason to look beyond Rosenthal’s theory to another sort of HOT theory. I then offer my own HOT theory as a suitable alternative, before concluding in a final section.en
dc.format.extent18
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofTransformação: Revista de Filosofia
dc.rightsOpen
dc.subjectConsciousness, higher-order thought, David Rosenthal, quotational-higher-order thought theory, physicalism
dc.titleThe Merits of Higher-Order Thought Theoriesen
dc.contributor.institutionPhilosophy
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Humanities
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Humanities
dc.description.versiontypeFinal Published version
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-12-28
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2018.v41esp.04.p31
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
herts.rights.accesstypeOpen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record