Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChristianson, B.
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-27T15:05:53Z
dc.date.available2019-03-27T15:05:53Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-28
dc.identifier.citationChristianson , B 2015 , ' Not Just Cyberwarfare ' , Philosophy and Technology , vol. 28 , no. 3 , pp. 359-363 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0195-x
dc.identifier.issn2210-5433
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 8574127
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 26d00a23-68dd-42e7-8d2e-70398599624a
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84939130592
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/21226
dc.description© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015
dc.description.abstractBringsjord and Licato provide a general meta-argument that cyberwarfare is so different from traditional kinetic warfare that no argument from analogy can allow the just war theory of Augustine and Aquinas (hereinafter called JWT) to be pulled over from traditional (modern) warfare to cyberwarfare. I believe that this meta- argument is sound and that it applies not just to cyberwarfare: in particular, on my reading of the meta-argument, argument from analogy has never been adequate to allow JWT to be applied to the kind of warfare that we are familiar with now.en
dc.format.extent5
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophy and Technology
dc.titleNot Just Cyberwarfareen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionScience & Technology Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Computer Science and Informatics Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionSMUR
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0195-x
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record