| dc.contributor.author | Christianson, B. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-27T15:05:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-03-27T15:05:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-03-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Christianson , B 2015 , ' Not Just Cyberwarfare ' , Philosophy and Technology , vol. 28 , no. 3 , pp. 359-363 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0195-x | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2210-5433 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/21226 | |
| dc.description | © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Bringsjord and Licato provide a general meta-argument that cyberwarfare is so different from traditional kinetic warfare that no argument from analogy can allow the just war theory of Augustine and Aquinas (hereinafter called JWT) to be pulled over from traditional (modern) warfare to cyberwarfare. I believe that this meta- argument is sound and that it applies not just to cyberwarfare: in particular, on my reading of the meta-argument, argument from analogy has never been adequate to allow JWT to be applied to the kind of warfare that we are familiar with now. | en |
| dc.format.extent | 5 | |
| dc.format.extent | 104868 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Philosophy and Technology | |
| dc.title | Not Just Cyberwarfare | en |
| dc.contributor.institution | School of Computer Science | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Science & Technology Research Institute | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Centre for Computer Science and Informatics Research | |
| dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
| rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1007/s13347-015-0195-x | |
| rioxxterms.type | Other | |
| herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |
