Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRainer, A.
dc.contributor.authorHall, T.
dc.contributor.authorBaddoo, N.
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-19T10:30:46Z
dc.date.available2008-06-19T10:30:46Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationRainer , A , Hall , T & Baddoo , N 2003 , Persuading developers to buy into software process improvement: a local opinion and empirical evidence . in Procs 2003 Int Symp on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE) . Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) , pp. 326-335 .
dc.identifier.isbn0-7695-2002-2
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/2124
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/2124
dc.descriptionThis material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.---- Copyright IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.
dc.description.abstractIn order to investigate practitioners’ opinions of software process and software process improvement, we have collected a large volume of qualitative evidence from 13 companies. At the same time, other researchers have reported investigations of practitioners, and we are interested in how their reports may relate to our evidence. Thus, other research publications can also be treated as a form of qualitative data. In this paper, we review advice on a method, content analysis, that is used to analyse qualitative data. We use content analysis to describe and analyse discussions on software process and software process improvement. We report preliminary findings from an analysis of both the focus group evidence and four publications.en
dc.format.extent248764
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
dc.relation.ispartofProcs 2003 Int Symp on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE)
dc.titlePersuading developers to buy into software process improvement: a local opinion and empirical evidenceen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionScience & Technology Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Computer Science and Informatics Research
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Physics, Engineering & Computer Science
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record