Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrank, Marje
dc.contributor.authorSofiev, Mikhail
dc.contributor.authorTsyro, Svetlana
dc.contributor.authorHendriks, Carlijn
dc.contributor.authorSemeena, Valiyaveetil
dc.contributor.authorVazhappilly Francis, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorButler, Tim
dc.contributor.authorDenier van der Gon, Hugo
dc.contributor.authorFriedrich, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorKong, Xin
dc.contributor.authorHendricks, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, Mark
dc.contributor.authorRighi, Mattia
dc.contributor.authorSamaras, Zissis
dc.contributor.authorSausen, Robert
dc.contributor.authorKukkonen, Jaakko
dc.contributor.authorSokhi, Ranjeet
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-26T14:03:44Z
dc.date.available2019-04-26T14:03:44Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-18
dc.identifier.citationPrank , M , Sofiev , M , Tsyro , S , Hendriks , C , Semeena , V , Vazhappilly Francis , X , Butler , T , Denier van der Gon , H , Friedrich , R , Kong , X , Hendricks , J , Lawrence , M , Righi , M , Samaras , Z , Sausen , R , Kukkonen , J & Sokhi , R 2016 , ' Evaluation of the performance of four chemical transport models in predicting the aerosol chemical composition in Europe in 2005 ' , Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , vol. 16 , pp. 6041–6070 . https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6041-2016
dc.identifier.issn1680-7316
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-9785-1781/work/104213751
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/21302
dc.description© Author(s) 2016.
dc.description.abstractFour regional chemistry transport models were applied to simulate the concentration and composition of particulate matter (PM) in Europe for 2005 with horizontal resolution 20 km. The modelled concentrations were compared with the measurements of PM chemical composition by the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) monitoring network. All models systematically underestimated PM10 and PM2:5 by 10–60 %, depending on the model and the season of the year, when the calculated dry PM mass was compared with the measurements. The average water content at laboratory conditions was estimated between 5 and 20% for PM2:5 and between 10 and 25% for PM10. For majority of the PM chemical components, the relative underestimation was smaller than it was for total PM, exceptions being the carbonaceous particles and mineral dust. Some species, such as sea salt and NO3, were overpredicted by the models. There were notable differences between the models’ predictions of the seasonal variations of PM, mainly attributable to different treatments or omission of some source categories and aerosol processes. Benzo(a)pyrene concentrations were overestimated by all the models over the whole year. The study stresses the importance of improving the models’ skill in simulating mineral dust and carbonaceous compounds, necessity for high-quality emissions from wildland fires, as well as the need for an explicit consideration of aerosol water content in model–measurement comparison.en
dc.format.extent5604016
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
dc.subjectAEROSOLS
dc.subjectPARTICULATE MATTER
dc.subjectchemical transport models
dc.titleEvaluation of the performance of four chemical transport models in predicting the aerosol chemical composition in Europe in 2005en
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Atmospheric and Climate Physics Research
dc.contributor.institutionAtmospheric Dynamics & Air Quality
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.5194/acp-16-6041-2016
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record