Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRomero Moreno, Felipe
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-11T14:38:49Z
dc.date.available2019-06-11T14:38:49Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-04
dc.identifier.citationRomero Moreno , F 2019 , ' 'Notice and staydown' and social media: amending Article 13 of the Proposed Directive on Copyright ' , International Review of Law, Computers & Technology , vol. 33 , no. 2 , pp. 187-210 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2018.1475906
dc.identifier.issn1360-0869
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7545-7740/work/124446591
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/21370
dc.description© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.description.abstractThis paper critically assesses the compatibility of content recognition and filtering technology or so-called notice and staydown approach with the right of social network platforms and users to a fair trial, privacy and freedom of expression under Articles 6, 8 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (1950) (ECHR). The analysis draws on Article 13 of the European Commission’s proposal for a Directive on Copyright, the case-law of the Strasbourg and Luxembourg Court and academic literature. It argues that the adoption of content recognition and filtering technology could pose a threat to social network platforms and user human rights. It considers the compliance of ‘notice and staydown’ with the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) three-part, non-cumulative test, to determine whether a ‘notice and staydown’ approach is, firstly, ‘in accordance with the law’, secondly, pursues one or more legitimate aims included in Article 8(2) and 10(2) ECHR and thirdly, is ‘necessary’ and ‘proportionate’. It concludes that ‘notice and staydown’ could infringe part one and part three of the ECtHR test as well as the ECtHR principle of equality of arms, thereby violating the rights of social network platforms and users under Articles 6, 8 and 10 of the Convention.en
dc.format.extent24
dc.format.extent2263321
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Review of Law, Computers & Technology
dc.subjectECHR
dc.subjecthuman rights
dc.subjectNotice and staydown
dc.subjectArticle 13 EU Copyright Directive
dc.subjectArticle 17 EU Copyright Directive
dc.subjectUpload filters
dc.subjectPrivacy
dc.subjectFreedom of expression
dc.subjectright to a fair trial
dc.subjectECtHR
dc.subjectCJEU
dc.subjectGoogle
dc.subjectAudible Magic
dc.subjectContent ID
dc.subjectComputer Science Applications
dc.subjectLaw
dc.title'Notice and staydown' and social media: amending Article 13 of the Proposed Directive on Copyrighten
dc.contributor.institutionLaw
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Law School
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047809608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/13600869.2018.1475906
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record