Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHalamova, Julia
dc.contributor.authorKanovsky, Martin
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Paul
dc.contributor.authorTroop, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorZuroff, David
dc.contributor.authorPetrocchi, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorHermanto, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorKrieger, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorKirby, James
dc.contributor.authorAsano, Kenichi
dc.contributor.authorMatos, Marcela
dc.contributor.authorYu, F
dc.contributor.authorSommers-Spijkerman, Marion
dc.contributor.authorShahar, B
dc.contributor.authorBasran, Jaskaran
dc.contributor.authorKupeli, Nuriye
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-05T00:08:36Z
dc.date.available2019-07-05T00:08:36Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-01
dc.identifier.citationHalamova , J , Kanovsky , M , Gilbert , P , Troop , N , Zuroff , D , Petrocchi , N , Hermanto , N , Krieger , T , Kirby , J , Asano , K , Matos , M , Yu , F , Sommers-Spijkerman , M , Shahar , B , Basran , J & Kupeli , N 2019 , ' Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples ' , Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy , vol. 37 , no. 4 , pp. 411-444 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1
dc.identifier.issn1573-6563
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/21420
dc.description© The Author(s) 2019.
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples (N = 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed differential test functioning for the three FSCRS subscales, Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self and Reassured-Self separately. 32 of the 78 pairwise comparisons between samples for Inadequate-Self, 42 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Reassured-Self and 54 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Hated-Self demonstrated no differential test functioning, i.e. measurement invariance. Hated-Self was the most invariant of the three subscales, suggesting that self-hatred is similarly perceived across different cultures. Nonetheless, all three subscales of FSCRS are sensitive to cross-cultural differences. Considering the possible cultural and linguistic differences in the expression of self-criticism and self-reassurance, future analyses of the meanings and connotations of these constructs across the world are necessary in order to develop or tailor a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-criticism.en
dc.format.extent34
dc.format.extent1087973
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
dc.subjectCross-cultural studies
dc.subjectDifferential test functioning
dc.subjectMeasurement invariance
dc.subjectSelf-criticism
dc.subjectSelf-reassurance
dc.subjectExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
dc.subjectClinical Psychology
dc.titleMultiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samplesen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology and Sports Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionPsychology
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Psychology and Sport Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionHealth and Clinical Psychology Research Group
dc.contributor.institutionPsycho-haematology Research Unit
dc.contributor.institutionWeight and Obesity Research Group
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065208849&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record