Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiranda, Rose
dc.contributor.authorBunn, Frances
dc.contributor.authorLynch, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorVan den Block, Lieve
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Claire
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-31T16:37:18Z
dc.date.available2019-07-31T16:37:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-01
dc.identifier.citationMiranda , R , Bunn , F , Lynch , J , Van den Block , L & Goodman , C 2019 , ' Palliative care for people with dementia living at home: a systematic review of interventions ' , Palliative Medicine , vol. 33 , no. 7 , pp. 726-742 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319847092
dc.identifier.issn0269-2163
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/21519
dc.description.abstractBackground: The European Association for Palliative Care White Paper defined optimal palliative care in dementia based on evidence and expert consensus. Yet, we know little on how to achieve this for people with dementia living and dying at home. Aims: To examine evidence on home palliative care interventions in dementia, in terms of their effectiveness on end-of-life care outcomes, factors influencing implementation, the extent to which they address the European Association for Palliative Care palliative care domains and evidence gaps. Design: A systematic review of home palliative care interventions in dementia. Data sources: The review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and the protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018093607). We searched four electronic databases up to April 2018 (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library and CINAHL) and conducted lateral searches. Results: We retrieved eight relevant studies, none of which was of high quality. The evidence, albeit of generally weak quality, showed the potential benefits of the interventions in improving end-of-life care outcomes, for example, behavioural disturbances. The interventions most commonly focused on optimal symptom management, continuity of care and psychosocial support. Other European Association for Palliative Care domains identified as important in palliative care for people with dementia, for example, prognostication of dying or avoidance of burdensome interventions were under-reported. No direct evidence on facilitators and barriers to implementation was found. Conclusions: The review highlights the paucity of high-quality dementia-specific research in this area and recommends key areas for future work, for example, the need for process evaluation to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing interventions.en
dc.format.extent17
dc.format.extent404586
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPalliative Medicine
dc.subjectPalliative care
dc.subjectdementia
dc.subjecthealth care
dc.subjecthome care services
dc.subjectprimary
dc.subjectterminal care
dc.subjectAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine
dc.titlePalliative care for people with dementia living at home: a systematic review of interventionsen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionEvidence Based Practice
dc.contributor.institutionOlder People's Health and Complex Conditions
dc.contributor.institutionNursing, Midwifery and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care
dc.contributor.institutionWeight and Obesity Research Group
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065491833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1177/0269216319847092
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record