Factors influencing application of behavioural science evidence by public health decision-makers and practitioners, and implications for practice
Author
Curtis, Kristina
Fulton, Emmie
Brown, Katherine
Attention
2299/21901
Abstract
The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK recommends behavioural science evidence underpins public health improvement services. In practice, level of implementation varies. This study is the first to explore factors affecting use of behaviour-specific evidence by public health decision-makers and practitioners for design and delivery of health improvement services. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted, along with a review of the commissioning cycle with public health decision-makers and practitioners across a range of health improvement fields (e.g. weight management). Interviews were informed and analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Limited comprehension of behaviour change, challenges identifying specific behaviour change strategies and translating research into practice were prevalent. Local authority processes encouraged uptake of evidence to justify solutions as opposed to evidence-driven decision-making. Some decision-makers perceived research evidence may stifle innovation and overwhelm practitioners. Potential facilitators of research use included: ensuring uptake and implementation of evidence is compulsory within commissioning and its potential to show value for money. A strong belief in local evidence and achieving outcomes were identified as barriers to research evidence uptake. Social and environmental challenges included cultural, political, and workload pressures and journal article accessibility. Embedding behavioural science systematically into public health practice requires changes throughout the public health system; from priorities set by national public health leaders to the way in which relevant evidence is disseminated. Framing factors affecting use of behavioural science evidence using the TDF is helpful for identifying the range of interventions and support needed to affect change.
Publication date
2018-12-01Published in
Preventive Medicine ReportsPublished version
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.08.012Other links
http://hdl.handle.net/2299/21901Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
P11 Pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards antimicrobial stewardship and resistance during the COVID-19 pandemic at secondary care settings in the UK
Abdelsalam Elshenawy, Rasha; Umaru, Nikkie; Aslanpour, Zoe (2024-08-23)Addressing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) became critical during the COVID-19 pandemic, as inappropriate antibiotic prescribing worsened AMR. The WHO emphasized the need for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), and the Royal ... -
An investigation into factors affecting the implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in two acute care settings
Abdelsalam Elshenawy, Rasha; Umaru, Nikkie; Aslanpour, Zoe (2022-05-19)This study investigates the factors impacting the implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic across two acute care settings. Utilising storytelling to enhance the impact of ... -
Mapping staff perspectives towards the delivery of hospital care for children and young people with and without learning disabilities in England : A mixed methods national study
Oulton, Kate; Gibson, Faith; Carr, Lucinda; Hassiotis, Angela; Jewitt, Carey; Kenten, Charlotte; Russell, Jessica; Whiting, Mark; Tuffrey-Wijne, Irene; Wray, Jo (2018-03-23)Background: Children and young people (CYP) with learning disabilities (LD) are a vulnerable population with increased risk of abuse and accidental injury and whose parents have reported concerns about the quality, safety ...