Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRose, Dawn C.
dc.contributor.authorCamreon, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorLovatt, Peter
dc.contributor.authorGrahn, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorAnnett, Lucy
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-04T01:26:09Z
dc.date.available2020-02-04T01:26:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-27
dc.identifier.citationRose , D C , Camreon , D , Lovatt , P , Grahn , J & Annett , L 2020 , ' Comparison of Spontaneous Motor Tempo during Finger Tapping, Toe Tapping and Stepping on the Spot in People with and without Parkinson's Disease ' , Journal of Movement Disorders , vol. 13 , no. 1 , pp. 47-56 . https://doi.org/10.14802/jmd.19043
dc.identifier.issn2005-940X
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-2082-1650/work/68611416
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/22149
dc.description© 2020 The Korean Movement Disorder Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Spontaneous motor tempo (SMT), observed in walking, tapping and clapping, tends to occur around 2 Hz. Initiating and controlling movement can be difficult for people with Parkinson's (PWP), but studies have not identified whether PWP differ from controls in SMT. For community-based interventions, e.g. dancing, it would be helpful to know a baseline SMT to optimize the tempi of cued activities. Therefore, this study compared finger tapping (FT), toe tapping (TT) and stepping 'on the spot' (SS) in PWP and two groups of healthy controls [age-matched controls (AMC) and young healthy controls (YHC)], as SMT is known to change with age. METHODS: Participants (PWP; n = 30, AMC; n = 23, YHC; n = 35) were asked to tap or step on the spot at a natural pace for two trials lasting 40 seconds. The central 30 seconds were averaged for analyses using mean inter-onset intervals (IOI) and coefficient of variation (CoV) to measure rate and variability respectively. RESULTS: PWP had faster SMT than both control groups, depending on the movement modality: FT, F(2, 87) = 7.92, p < 0.01 (PWP faster than YHC); TT, F(2, 87) = 4.89, p = 0.01 (PWP faster than AMC); and SS, F(2, 77) = 3.26, p = 0.04 (PWP faster than AMC). PWP had higher CoV (more variable tapping) than AMC in FT only, F(2, 87) = 4.10, p = 0.02. CONCLUSION: This study provides the first direct comparison of SMT between PWP and two control groups for different types of movements. RESULTS: suggest SMT is generally faster in PWP than control groups, and more variable when measured with finger tapping compared to stepping on the spot.en
dc.format.extent10
dc.format.extent342973
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Movement Disorders
dc.subjectParkinson's disease
dc.subjectspontaneous motor tempo
dc.subjectfinger and toe tapping
dc.subjectstepping
dc.subjectMovement
dc.subjectNeuroscience(all)
dc.subjectPsychology(all)
dc.titleComparison of Spontaneous Motor Tempo during Finger Tapping, Toe Tapping and Stepping on the Spot in People with and without Parkinson's Diseaseen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Psychology and Sport Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology and Sports Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionPsychology of Movement
dc.contributor.institutionPsychology
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.14802/jmd.19043
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record