Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGordon , Adam
dc.contributor.authorDevi, Reena
dc.contributor.authorWilliams , Chris
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Claire
dc.contributor.authorSartain , Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorChadborn , Neil
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T00:11:50Z
dc.date.available2020-10-29T00:11:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-15
dc.identifier.citationGordon , A , Devi , R , Williams , C , Goodman , C , Sartain , K & Chadborn , N 2020 , ' Protocol for a realist review of General Practitioners’ Role in Advancing Practice in Care Homes (GRAPE study) ' , BMJ Open , vol. 10 , e036221 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036221
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8938-4893/work/116555512
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/23362
dc.description© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Older people who live in care homes have a high level of need with complex health conditions. In addition to providing medical care to residents, general practitioners (GPs) play a role as gatekeeper for access to services, as well as leadership within healthcare provision. This review will describe how GPs were involved in initiatives to change arrangements of healthcare services in order to improve quality and experience of care. Methods and analysis Following RAMESES quality and publication guidelines standards, we will proceed with realist review to develop theories of how GPs work with care home staff to bring about improvements. We identify when improvement in outcomes does not occur and why this may be the case. The first stage will include interviews with GPs to ask their views on improvement in care homes. These interviews will enable development of initial theories and give direction for the literature searches. In the second stage, we will use iterative literature searches to add depth and context to the early theories; databases will include Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and ASSIA. In stage 3, evidence that is judged as rigorous and relevant will be used to test the initial theories, and through the process, refine the theory statements. In the final stage, we will synthesise findings and provide recommendations for practice and policy-making. During the review, we will invite a context expert group to reflect on our findings. This group will have expertise in current trends in primary care and the care home sector both in UK and internationally. Ethics and dissemination The study was approved by University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee: 354-1907. Findings will be shared through stakeholder networks, published in National Institute for Health Research journal and submitted for peer-reviewed journal publication.en
dc.format.extent6
dc.format.extent316867
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open
dc.subjectadult palliative care
dc.subjectchange management
dc.subjectgeriatric medicine
dc.subjectprimary care
dc.subjectquality in health care
dc.subjectsocial medicine
dc.subjectMedicine(all)
dc.titleProtocol for a realist review of General Practitioners’ Role in Advancing Practice in Care Homes (GRAPE study)en
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care
dc.contributor.institutionOlder People's Health and Complex Conditions
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086686950&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036221
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record