Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAdeyemi, Shola
dc.contributor.authorYakutcan, Usame
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Eren
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T17:45:21Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T17:45:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-22
dc.identifier.citationAdeyemi , S , Yakutcan , U & Demir , E 2020 , ' A statistical assessment of association between meteorological parameters and COVID-19 pandemic in 10 countries ' , Journal of Global Health Reports , vol. 4 , pp. e2020066 . < https://joghr.scholasticahq.com/article/13693 >
dc.identifier.issn2399-1623
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9648-5529/work/127510011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/23467
dc.description.abstractBackground Eleven out of 13 published articles reported temperature and humidity as factors that could reduce the daily confirmed COVID-19 cases among many other findings. However, there are significant caveats, related to statistical assumptions and the spatial-temporal nature of the data. Methods Associative and causative analyses of data was conducted for 10 countries representing 6 continents of the world, with data obtained between January 22, 2020 to April 30, 2020. Daily confirmed cases, number of deaths, recovered cases, lockdown stringency index, and several meteorological factors are considered. Also, a Granger-Causality test was performed to check if any COVID-19 outcomes are influenced by itself and not by any or combination of maximum temperature, humidity, wind speed and stringency index. Results Most of the associations reported in the literature, between meteorological parameters and COVID-19 pandemic are weak evidence, need to be interpreted with caution, as most of these articles neglected the temporal spatial nature of the data. Based on our findings, most of the correlations no matter which coefficient is used are mostly and strictly between -0.5 and 0.5, and these are weak correlations. An interesting finding is the correlation between stringency and each of the COVID-19 outcomes, the strongest being between stringency and confirmed cases, 0.80 (0.78, 0.82) P<.0001. Similarly, wind speed is weakly associated with recovery rate, 0.22 (0.16, 0.28) P<.0001. Lastly, the Granger-Causality test of no dependencies was accepted at P=0.1593, suggesting independence among the parameters. Conclusions Although many articles reported association between meteorological parameters and COVID-19, they mainly lack strong evidence and clear interpretation of the statistical results (e.g. underlying assumption, confidence intervals, a clear hypothesis). Our findings showed that, without effective control measures, strong outbreaks are likely in more windy climates and summer weather, humidity or warmer temperature will not substantially limit pandemic growth.en
dc.format.extent13
dc.format.extent11252939
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Global Health Reports
dc.titleA statistical assessment of association between meteorological parameters and COVID-19 pandemic in 10 countriesen
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Business School
dc.contributor.institutionStatistical Services Consulting Unit
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttps://joghr.scholasticahq.com/article/13693
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record