Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChen, Y.K.
dc.contributor.authorModi, O.P.
dc.contributor.authorMhay, A.S.
dc.contributor.authorChrysanthou, A.
dc.contributor.authorO'Sullivan, J.M.
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-17T07:48:02Z
dc.date.available2008-09-17T07:48:02Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationChen , Y K , Modi , O P , Mhay , A S , Chrysanthou , A & O'Sullivan , J M 2003 , ' The effect of different metallic counterface materials and different surface treatments on the wear and friction of polyamide 66 and its composite in rolling-sliding contact ' , Wear , vol. 255 , pp. 714-721 . https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648
dc.identifier.issn1873-2577
dc.identifier.otherdspace: 2299/2372
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/2372
dc.descriptionOriginal article can be found at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00431648 Copyright Elsevier B. V. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00054-1
dc.description.abstractThe effect of different metallic counterface materials and different surface treatments on the tribological behaviour of polymer and polymer composite under unlubricated, non-conformal and rolling-sliding contact has been investigated. The most widely used polymer materials - unreinforced polyamide 66 and its composite (RFL4036) – were tested. The metallic materials include aluminium, brass and steel and the surface treatments include Tufftride** treated (known as nitrocarbonising) and magnesium phosphate treated, etc. Tests were conducted over a range of slip ratios at a fixed load of 300 N, 1000 rpm rotational speed using a twin-disc test rig. The experimental results showed that the polyamide composite exhibited less friction and wear than the unreinforced polyamide 66 when running against steel and aluminium counterfaces. However, when tested against brass, polyamide 66 exhibited lower wear than the composite. The surface treatment of steel has a significant effect on the coefficient of friction and the wear rate, as well as on the tribological mechanism, of polyamide 66 composites. It has been observed that a thin film on the contact surface plays a dominant role in reducing the wear and friction of the composite and in suppressing the transverse cracks. This study clearly indicates that both the characteristics of the different counterface metallic materials and the surface treatment greatly control the wear behaviour of polyamide 66 and its composite.en
dc.format.extent708336
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofWear
dc.subjectWear
dc.subjectPolyamide 66 composite
dc.subjectmetals and surface treatments
dc.subjectRolling-sliding contact
dc.titleThe effect of different metallic counterface materials and different surface treatments on the wear and friction of polyamide 66 and its composite in rolling-sliding contacten
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Engineering and Technology
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Physics, Engineering & Computer Science
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Engineering and Technology
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Engineering Research
dc.contributor.institutionEnergy and Sustainable Design Research Group
dc.contributor.institutionMaterials and Structures
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Climate Change Research (C3R)
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/S0043-1648
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record