dc.contributor.author | Giovinazzo, Francesco | |
dc.contributor.author | Avolio, Alfonso W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Galiandro, Federica | |
dc.contributor.author | Vitale, Alessandro | |
dc.contributor.author | Dalla Riva, Giulio V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Biancofiore, Gianni | |
dc.contributor.author | Sharma, Shivani | |
dc.contributor.author | Muiesan, Paolo | |
dc.contributor.author | Agnes, Salvatore | |
dc.contributor.author | Burra, Patrizia | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-11T12:15:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-11T12:15:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-02-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Giovinazzo , F , Avolio , A W , Galiandro , F , Vitale , A , Dalla Riva , G V , Biancofiore , G , Sharma , S , Muiesan , P , Agnes , S & Burra , P 2021 , ' Solid organ transplantation during COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons from an international web-based survey on resources' allocation ' , Transplantation Direct , vol. 7 , no. 3 , p e669 . https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001115 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2373-8731 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/24465 | |
dc.description | © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.description.abstract | Background. Solid organ transplants (SOTs) are life-saving interventions, recently challenged by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). SOTs require a multistep process, which can be affected by COVID-19 at several phases. Methods. SOT-specialists, COVID-19-specialists, and medical ethicists designed an international survey according to CHERRIES guidelines. Personal opinions about continuing SOTs, safe managing of donors and recipients, as well as equity of resources’ allocation were investigated. The survey was sent by e-mail. Multiple approaches were used (corresponding authors from Scopus, websites of scientific societies, COVID-19 webinars). After the descriptive analysis, univariate and multivariate ordinal regression analysis was performed. Results. There were 1819 complete answers from 71 countries. The response rate was 49%. Data were stratified according to region, macrospecialty, and organ of interest. Answers were analyzed using univariate-multivariate ordinal regression analysis and thematic analysis. Overall, 20% of the responders thought SOTs should not stop (continue transplant without restriction); over 70% suggested SOTs should selectively stop, and almost 10% indicated they should completely stop. Furthermore, 82% agreed to shift resources from transplant to COVID-19 temporarily. Briefly, main reason for not stopping was that if the transplant will not proceed, the organ will be wasted. Focusing on SOT from living donors, 61% stated that activity should be restricted only to “urgent” cases. At the multivariate analysis, factors identified in favor of continuing transplant were Italy, ethicist, partially disagreeing on the equity question, a high number of COVID-19-related deaths on the day of the answer, a high IHDI country. Factors predicting to stop SOTs were Europe except-Italy, public university hospital, and strongly agreeing on the equity question. Conclusions. In conclusion, the majority of responders suggested that transplant activity should be continued through the implementation of isolation measures and the adoption of the COVID-19-free pathways. Differences between professional categories are less strong than supposed. | en |
dc.format.extent | 16 | |
dc.format.extent | 1930364 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Transplantation Direct | |
dc.title | Solid organ transplantation during COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons from an international web-based survey on resources' allocation | en |
dc.contributor.institution | Psychology | |
dc.contributor.institution | Centre for Research in Psychology and Sport Sciences | |
dc.contributor.institution | Centre for Health Services and Clinical Research | |
dc.contributor.institution | Basic and Clinical Science Unit | |
dc.contributor.institution | Health and Clinical Psychology Research Group | |
dc.contributor.institution | Behaviour Change in Health and Business | |
dc.contributor.institution | School of Life and Medical Sciences | |
dc.contributor.institution | Department of Psychology, Sport and Geography | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001115 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |