Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBartle, Kevin
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-21T10:18:31Z
dc.date.available2021-06-21T10:18:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-16
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/24596
dc.description.abstractThis thesis draws upon relational explanations of human action to understand the author’s experiences of school leadership in conditions of uncertainty. The central arguments arrived at in this inquiry recognise the importance and inevitability of plurality (Arendt, 1958) in organisational life, the co-constructed nature of shared responsibility for political action (ibid) within this plurality, and the importance of a professional community of inquiry (Peirce, 1955) for helping school leaders to engage in thoughtful action (Arendt, 2005) in uncertain times. This involves a paradoxical understanding of time, with the thesis concluding by stressing the importance of the human capacity to make promises and forgive as crucial to the emergent ethics of school leadership. These insights emerged from the author’s critical engagement with taken-for-granted insights about leadership in education. The research for this thesis involved ‘taking experience seriously’ (Mowles & Stacey, 2016), with the author inquiring into narratives of unexpected and disturbing events in his practice of school leadership with others. Taking an autoethnographic approach supported by other members of the DMan academic community of inquiry, the author has gained reflexive insights about his practice as a headteacher. In making sense of the disturbances, the author has revisited and critiqued theories that previously shaped his practice as a headteacher of an English secondary school. This thesis shows how theories of ‘distributed leadership’ (Gronn, 2002; Harris, 2003, 2004) and ‘relational trust’ (Bryk & Schneider, 2002; Tschannen-Moran, 1997, 2000, 2009, 2014) make claims which do not appear to explain the experiences of headship described in the empirical narrative material. As a result of these findings, the author questions the assumptions of transformational leadership; the dominant managerial paradigm in education. It is argued that transformational leadership discourses offer magico-mythical thinking (Elias, 1956) that creates myths to solve the mystery (Stacey, 2007) of routinely conflictual and contingent experiences of organisational life in school leadership. The three myths of distributed leadership and relational trust theories are identified as ‘enduring harmony’, ‘complexity reduction’ and ‘positional authority’. In deconstructing the mythological assumptions of transformational leadership, this thesis concludes with reconstructive counterarguments. Rather than expect enduring harmony, a community of inquiry is conflictual. Instead of seeking reduced complexity through idealised values, thoughtful action involves the unpredictable functionalisation of those values with others (Mead, 1923). Rather than rely on the sovereignty of the headteacher’s positional authority, thoughtful action in a community of inquiry offers a social process of human relating in pursuit of school improvement. The human ability to forgive and be forgiven, and to make promises and try to keep them (Arendt, 1958), are integral to the counterarguments presented in this thesis. This thesis makes a number of interrelated claims for a contribution to knowledge presenting, from the perspective of a headteacher, a nuanced critique of some of the myths underpinning transformational school leadership theories. This thesis offers a phenomenological understanding of the implications of these myths for practitioners and suggests that thoughtful action within a plurality, seen as a community of inquiry, represents an ethical practice of school leadership for headteachers and other managers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectPluralityen_US
dc.subjectPoliticsen_US
dc.subjectThoughtful Actionen_US
dc.subjectCommunity of Inquiryen_US
dc.subjectUncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectDistributed Leadershipen_US
dc.subjectRelational Trusten_US
dc.subjectTransformational Leadershipen_US
dc.subjectAutoethnographyen_US
dc.subjectNarrativesen_US
dc.subjectMagico-Mythical Thinkingen_US
dc.subjectHarmonyen_US
dc.subjectConflicten_US
dc.subjectComplexityen_US
dc.subjectAuthorityen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.titleThe Struggle for Plurality and Politics in School Leadership Practice: Exploring the Importance of Thoughtful Action in Conditions of Uncertaintyen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.18745/th.24596*
dc.identifier.doi10.18745/th.24596
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnameDManen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-04-16
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-06-21
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue
rioxxterms.funder.projectba3b3abd-b137-4d1d-949a-23012ce7d7b9en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess