Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDagdeviren, Hulya
dc.contributor.authorKarwowski, Ewa
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-05T14:30:01Z
dc.date.available2021-08-05T14:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-02
dc.identifier.citationDagdeviren , H & Karwowski , E 2021 , ' Impasse or mutation? Austerity and (de)financialisation of local governments in Britain ' , Journal of Economic Geography . https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbab028
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 25478382
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 88a75ff0-2065-4f16-ab2a-ea234eef53ee
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-6350-1839/work/98164043
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/24957
dc.description© The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbab028
dc.description.abstractPost crisis, local governments’ budgets have been drastically cut in Britain. Similar budgetary strains had serious consequences in the past, leading to major restructuring in local governments’ functions. This paper interrogates the spatial dynamics of short-term municipal finances by putting into dialogue the political economy perspectives on financialisation with the economic geography literature on urban governance. Using data for over four hundred municipal authorities in Britain, we examine locational underpinnings of changing financial practices with respect to spending cuts. We find that austerity increased risk and uncertainty for local governments, leading them to resort to short-term borrowing for current spending to preserve key services in breach of regulatory guidance. Effectively, an internal market for inter-council lending and borrowing has been created based on market principles in which local governments with surplus cash and reserves have extended credit to those with liquidity problems. On the asset side, the austerity programme forced them to embrace financial logics through a spectacular shift from cash and deposit holdings to investment in money market funds and credit extension as they have strived to generate as much income as possible to fund services at risk.en
dc.format.extent23
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Geography
dc.subjectFinancialisation
dc.subjectlocal governments
dc.subjectausterity
dc.subjectBritain
dc.titleImpasse or mutation? Austerity and (de)financialisation of local governments in Britainen
dc.contributor.institutionOrganisation, Markets and Policy Research Group
dc.contributor.institutionHertfordshire Business School
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Climate Change Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2023-08-02
dc.relation.schoolHertfordshire Business School
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-08-02
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbab028
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record