Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorallum, laura
dc.contributor.authorapps, chloe
dc.contributor.authorhart, nick
dc.contributor.authorPattison, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorconnolly, bronwen
dc.contributor.authorrose, louise
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-23T14:30:02Z
dc.date.available2021-08-23T14:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-19
dc.identifier.citationallum , L , apps , C , hart , N , Pattison , N , connolly , B & rose , L 2020 , ' Standardising care in the ICU: a protocol for a scoping review of tools used to improve care delivery ' , Systematic reviews , vol. 9 , no. 1 , 164 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01414-6
dc.identifier.issn2046-4053
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 5badaaefc3034dcc9e78f0e8b32f0d54
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 5badaaefc3034dcc9e78f0e8b32f0d54
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: s13643-020-01414-6
dc.identifier.othermanuscript: 1414
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-6771-8733/work/99079145
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/24998
dc.description© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Background: Increasing numbers of critically ill patients experience a prolonged intensive care unit stay contributing to greater physical and psychological morbidity, strain on families and cost to health systems. Quality improvement tools such as checklists concisely articulate best practices with the aim of improving quality and safety; however, these tools have not been designed for the specific needs of patients with prolonged ICU stay. The primary objective of this review will be to determine the characteristics including format and content of multicomponent tools designed to standardise or improve ICU care. Secondary objectives are to describe the outcomes reported in these tools, the type of patients and settings studied, and to understand how these tools were developed and implemented in clinical practice. Methods: We will search the Cochrane Library, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, OpenGrey, NHS evidence and Trial Registries from January 2000 onwards. We will include primary research studies (e.g. experimental, quasi-experimental, observational and qualitative studies) recruiting more than 10 adult participants admitted to ICUs, high dependency units and weaning centres regardless of length of stay, describing quality improvement tools such as structured care plans or checklists designed to standardize more than one aspect of care delivery. We will extract data on study and patient characteristics, tool design and implementation strategies and measured outcomes. Two reviewers will independently screen citations for eligible studies and perform data extraction. Data will be synthesised with descriptive statistics; we will use a narrative synthesis to describe review findings. Discussion: The findings will be used to guide development of tools for use with prolonged ICU stay patients. Our group will use experience-based co-design methods to identify the most important actionable processes of care to include in quality improvement tools these patients. Such tools are needed to standardise practice and thereby improve quality of care. Illustrating the development and implementation methods used for such tools will help to guide translation of similar tools into ICU clinical practice and future research. Systematic review registration: This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/, DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z8MREen
dc.format.extent315003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSystematic reviews
dc.subjectProtocol
dc.subjectCritical care, Patient care planning, Checklist, Delivery of Healthcare, Prolonged critical illness
dc.titleStandardising care in the ICU: a protocol for a scoping review of tools used to improve care deliveryen
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Applied Clinical, Health and Care Research (CACHE)
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Adult Nursing and Primary Care
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s13643-020-01414-6
rioxxterms.typeOther
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record