Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarzykowski, Krystian
dc.contributor.authorHajdas, Sabina
dc.contributor.authorRadel, Remi
dc.contributor.authorNiedzwienska, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.authorKvavilashvili, Lia
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-24T13:45:02Z
dc.date.available2021-11-24T13:45:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-01
dc.identifier.citationBarzykowski , K , Hajdas , S , Radel , R , Niedzwienska , A & Kvavilashvili , L 2021 , ' The role of inhibitory control and ADHD symptoms in the occurrence of involuntary thoughts about the past and future: An individual differences study ' , Consciousness and cognition , vol. 95 , 103208 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103208
dc.identifier.issn1053-8100
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 26370674
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 45d8a200-09b4-4582-9256-ff18b2db6264
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/25202
dc.description© 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103208
dc.description.abstractThe present study focused on involuntary thoughts about personal past events (i.e., involuntary autobiographical memories; IAMs), and involuntary thoughts about future events and plans (i.e., involuntary future thoughts; IFTs). The frequency of these involuntary thoughts is influenced by cognitive demands of ongoing activities, but the exact underlying mechanism(s) has yet to be revealed. The present study tested two possible explanations: (1) the special inhibitory mechanism switches on when one is engaged in attentionally demanding activities; (2) different levels of cognitive load interfere with cue-noticing that act as triggers for IAMs and IFTs. We report a study with pre-selected groups of participants that differed in terms of their individual level of inhibitory control capacity (high vs. low), and completed both standard and attentionally demanding versions of a laboratory vigilance task with irrelevant cue-words to trigger IAMs and IFTs, and random thought-probes to measure their frequency. To examine the level of incidental cue-noticing, participants also completed an unexpected cue-recognition task. Despite large differences between groups in inhibitory control capacity, the number of IFTs and IAMs, reported in the attentionally demanding condition, was comparable. In addition, high cognitive load reduced the number of IAMs, but not IFTs. Finally, the recognition of incidental cues encountered in the vigilance task was reduced under high cognitive load condition, indicating that poor cue-noticing may be the main underlying mechanism of cognitive load effect rather than the lack of inhibitory resources needed to suppress involuntary retrieval. This and other possible mechanisms and avenues for future research are discussed.en
dc.format.extent19
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofConsciousness and cognition
dc.subjectInvoluntary memories
dc.subjectInvoluntary future thought
dc.subjectAutobiographical memory
dc.subjectInhibition
dc.subjectCognitive control
dc.subjectMental time travel
dc.subjectIndividual differences
dc.subjectCognitive load
dc.titleThe role of inhibitory control and ADHD symptoms in the occurrence of involuntary thoughts about the past and future: An individual differences studyen
dc.contributor.institutionPsychology
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Psychology and Sport Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionLearning, Memory and Thinking
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.date.embargoedUntil2022-10-01
dc.relation.schoolSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-10-01
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103208
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record