Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrench, Christian
dc.contributor.authorCubbidge, Robert Peter
dc.contributor.authorHeitmar, Rebekka
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T13:00:01Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T13:00:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-07
dc.identifier.citationFrench , C , Cubbidge , R P & Heitmar , R 2022 , ' The application of arterio‐venous ratio (AVR) cut‐off values in clinic to stratify cardiovascular risk in patients ' , Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics . https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12967
dc.identifier.issn0275-5408
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 144184
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: opo12967
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/25427
dc.description© 2022 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Cardiovascular risk calculators are a useful tool for identifying at‐risk individuals. There are standardised methods for assessing the retinal microcirculation which alters as a consequence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to explore if a standardised retinal vessel assessment conducted in primary optometric care reflects current cardiovascular risk, as measured using two validated CVD risk calculators (QRISK 2; Mayo Clinic). Methods: A total of 120 subjects were included in the analyses. Following a routine eye examination, participants had disc‐centred retinal photographs and systemic blood pressure taken. Retinal vessel parameters (central retinal artery and vein equivalent and arterio‐venous ratio (AVR)) were calculated using semi‐automated software. Participants were then grouped into AVR quintiles as defined by the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC). Cardiovascular risk was calculated with the validated QRISK and Mayo Clinic health calculators. Results: Systolic blood pressure was significantly greater in those with an AVR value falling in the lowest quintile compared to the highest quintile (150.65 mmHg vs. 132.21 mmHg [p = 0.001]). Similarly, CVD risk was significantly higher in those with the lowest AVR compared to the highest (QRISK: 14.28% vs. 9.87% [p = 0.05]; MAYO risk: 36.35% vs. 19.21% [p = 0.01]). Chi squared analyses showed a significant difference in the number of hypertensives in the lowest AVR quintile compared to those in the highest [p = 0.02]. Conclusion: Whilst the ARIC population is not directly comparable to the population used to develop the QRISK calculator, it has been shown that its application could help to identify at risk individuals using retinal vessel analyses.en
dc.format.extent9
dc.format.extent1183139
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOphthalmic and Physiological Optics
dc.subjectORIGINAL ARTICLE
dc.subjectORIGINAL ARTICLES
dc.subjectAV ratio
dc.subjectcardiovascular disease
dc.subjectoptometry
dc.subjectretinal blood vessel
dc.titleThe application of arterio‐venous ratio (AVR) cut‐off values in clinic to stratify cardiovascular risk in patientsen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Science
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Life and Medical Sciences
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/opo.12967
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record