Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBuckner, Stefanie
dc.contributor.authorLafortune, Louise
dc.contributor.authorDarlington, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorDickinson, Angela
dc.contributor.authorKillett, Anne
dc.contributor.authorMathie, Elspeth
dc.contributor.authorMayrhofer, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorWoodward, Michael
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Claire
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-21T12:30:05Z
dc.date.available2022-10-21T12:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-30
dc.identifier.citationBuckner , S , Lafortune , L , Darlington , N , Dickinson , A , Killett , A , Mathie , E , Mayrhofer , A , Woodward , M & Goodman , C 2022 , ' A suite of evaluation resources for Dementia Friendly Communities: Development and guidance for use ' , Dementia , vol. 21 , no. 8 , pp. 2381-2401 . https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012221106634
dc.identifier.issn1471-3012
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 670621
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 670621
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: 10.1177_14713012221106634
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7681-2732/work/121257233
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2505-1256/work/121257509
dc.identifier.otherPubMedCentral: PMC9583293
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-5871-436X/work/157529582
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/25829
dc.description© The Author(s) 2022. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
dc.description.abstractObjectives: In the context of a growing number of dementia friendly communities (DFCs) globally, a need remains for robust evaluation, and for tools to capture relevant evidence. This paper reports the development of a suite of evaluation resources for DFCs through a national study in England. Methods: Fieldwork took place in six diverse case study sites across England. A mixed methods design was adopted that entailed documentary analysis, focus groups, interviews, observations, and a survey. Participants were people affected by dementia and practice-based stakeholders. A national stakeholder workshop was held to obtain input beyond the research sites. A workshop at the end of the study served to check the resonance of the findings and emerging outputs with stakeholders from the case study DFCs. Results: The study had three key outputs for the evaluation of DFCs: First, an evaluation framework that highlights thematic areas to be considered in evaluating DFCs. Second, a Theory of Change that presents inputs into a DFC and short, medium and longer term outcomes. Third, a matrix for assessing a DFC’s degree of maturity, which enables a sense of the kinds of outcomes a DFC might realistically aspire to. These three outputs form a suite of interlinking and complementary evaluation resources for DFCs. Conclusions: The study has contributed evidence-based resources for monitoring and evaluation that complement existing frameworks. They can be applied to arrive at a detailed assessment of how well a DFC works for people affected by dementia, and at insights into the underlying factors that can guide future policy and practice.en
dc.format.extent21
dc.format.extent9279873
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDementia
dc.subjectArticles
dc.subjectdementia friendly communities
dc.subjectevaluation
dc.subjectmonitoring
dc.subjectpeople affected by dementia
dc.subjectmixed methods
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectFocus Groups
dc.subjectEngland
dc.subjectPalliative Care
dc.subjectDementia/therapy
dc.subjectGeneral Social Sciences
dc.subjectSociology and Political Science
dc.titleA suite of evaluation resources for Dementia Friendly Communities: Development and guidance for useen
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care
dc.contributor.institutionOlder People's Health and Complex Conditions
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionNursing, Midwifery and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionCommunities, Young People and Family Lives
dc.contributor.institutionResearch Unit in Sport, Physical Activity and Ageing
dc.contributor.institutionPatient Experience and Public Involvement
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Adult Nursing and Primary Care
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Applied Clinical, Health and Care Research (CACHE)
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Future Societies Research
dc.contributor.institutionSport and Social Inclusion Research Group
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138404117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1177/14713012221106634
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record