dc.contributor.author | Meyler, Samuel | |
dc.contributor.author | Bottoms, Lindsay | |
dc.contributor.author | Wellsted, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Muniz‐Pumares, Daniel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-31T12:30:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-31T12:30:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-04-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Meyler , S , Bottoms , L , Wellsted , D & Muniz‐Pumares , D 2023 , ' Variability in exercise tolerance and physiological responses to exercise prescribed relative to physiological thresholds and to maximum oxygen uptake ' , Experimental Physiology , vol. 108 , no. 4 , pp. 581-594 . https://doi.org/10.1113/ep090878 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0958-0670 | |
dc.identifier.other | Jisc: 870961 | |
dc.identifier.other | Jisc: 870961 | |
dc.identifier.other | publisher-id: eph13306 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-6748-9870/work/128033042 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0003-4632-3764/work/128033107 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0003-0976-697X/work/164840521 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2299/26027 | |
dc.description | © 2023 The Authors. Experimental Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.description.abstract | New Findings: What is the central question of this study? Does prescribing exercise intensity using physiological thresholds create a more homogeneous exercise stimulus than using traditional intensity anchors? What is the main finding and its importance? Prescribing exercise using physiological thresholds, notably critical power, reduced the variability in exercise tolerance and acute metabolic responses. At higher intensities, approaching or exceeding the transition from heavy to severe intensity exercise, the imprecision of using fixed % V ̇ O 2 max ${\dot V_{{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{max}}}}$ as an intensity anchor becomes amplified. Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine whether the variability in exercise tolerance and physiological responses is lower when exercise is prescribed relative to physiological thresholds (THR) compared to traditional intensity anchors (TRAD). Ten individuals completed a series of maximal exercise tests and a series of moderate (MOD), heavy (HVY) and severe intensity (HIIT) exercise bouts prescribed using THR intensity anchors (critical power and gas exchange threshold) and TRAD intensity anchors (maximum oxygen uptake; V ̇ O 2 max ${\dot V_{{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{max}}}}$ ). There were no differences in exercise tolerance or acute response variability between MODTHR and MODTRAD. All individuals completed HVYTHR but only 30% completed HVYTRAD. Compared to HVYTHR, where work rates were all below critical power, work rates in HVYTRAD exceeded critical power in 70% of individuals. There was, however, no difference in acute response variability between HVYTHR and HVYTRAD. All individuals completed HIITTHR but only 20% completed HIITTRAD. The variability in peak (F = 0.274) and average (F = 0.318) blood lactate responses was lower in HIITTHR compared to HIITTRAD. The variability in W′ depletion (the finite work capacity above critical power) after the final interval bout was lower in HIITTHR compared to HIITTRAD (F = 0.305). Using physiological thresholds to prescribe exercise intensity reduced the heterogeneity in exercise tolerance and physiological responses to exercise spanning the boundary between the heavy and severe intensity domains. To increase the precision of exercise intensity prescription, it is recommended that, where possible, physiological thresholds are used in place of V ̇ O 2 max ${\dot V_{{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{max}}}}$ . | en |
dc.format.extent | 14 | |
dc.format.extent | 2733751 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Experimental Physiology | |
dc.subject | RESEARCH ARTICLE | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL & EXERCISE | |
dc.subject | critical power | |
dc.subject | exercise intensity | |
dc.subject | exercise prescription | |
dc.subject | interindividual differences | |
dc.subject | Physiology (medical) | |
dc.subject | Nutrition and Dietetics | |
dc.subject | Physiology | |
dc.title | Variability in exercise tolerance and physiological responses to exercise prescribed relative to physiological thresholds and to maximum oxygen uptake | en |
dc.contributor.institution | School of Life and Medical Sciences | |
dc.contributor.institution | Centre for Future Societies Research | |
dc.contributor.institution | Department of Psychology, Sport and Geography | |
dc.contributor.institution | Centre for Research in Psychology and Sports | |
dc.contributor.institution | Psychology and NeuroDiversity Applied Research Unit | |
dc.contributor.institution | Health Research Methods Unit | |
dc.contributor.institution | Basic and Clinical Science Unit | |
dc.contributor.institution | Centre for Health Services and Clinical Research | |
dc.contributor.institution | Centre for Applied Clinical, Health and Care Research (CACHE) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Psychology | |
dc.contributor.institution | High Performance Sport Research Group | |
dc.contributor.institution | Exercise, Health and Wellbeing Research Group | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147260609&partnerID=8YFLogxK | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1113/ep090878 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessed | true | |