Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThomas, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorEwart, Catriona
dc.contributor.authorHill, Carolyn
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-16T12:15:01Z
dc.date.available2023-02-16T12:15:01Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-14
dc.identifier.citationThomas , N , Ewart , C & Hill , C 2023 , ' Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of home‐based urinalysis for albumin‐creatinine ratio with smartphone technology: A quality improvement project ' , Journal of Renal Care , pp. 1-8 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12460
dc.identifier.issn1755-6678
dc.identifier.otherJisc: 900668
dc.identifier.otherpublisher-id: jorc12460
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2299/26059
dc.description© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Renal Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Dialysis & Transplant Nurses Association/European Renal Care Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite albumin‐creatinine ratio (urine) testing being recommended for detection of chronic kidney disease among adults with diabetes, testing rates are suboptimal. Aim: We implemented and evaluated a quality improvement project in an inner‐city diabetes population in London, UK to assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing novel home‐based urinalysis using smartphone technology. Methods: After eligible patients were identified and consented, testing kits were sent to the patient's home. Test results and patient feedback were collected through the smartphone application. Focus group discussions were conducted to evaluate primary care staff perspectives on uptake and delivery of the service. Results: In total 2370 patients agreed to take part. Of these, 1244 completed the test (61% of those eligible) and of these, 465 (37%) had clinically significant albuminuria. 98% of patients found the test easy or very easy to use. Staff in primary care found the service to be beneficial for patients, and reported ease of set up and minimal administrative processes. Concerns regarding barriers among patients with lower digital literacy and non‐English speakers were raised although these concerns were not substantiated. Conclusion: Home‐based albumin‐creatinine ratio urine testing may improve the testing rates of people with diabetes at higher risk of chronic kidney disease. This is important post‐pandemic, as healthcare services are trying to return to pre‐pandemic levels of care. The study also found that the use of smartphone technology in an underserved (deprived) community is feasible, despite reservations about levels of digital literacy and possible language barriers. Further evaluation of effectiveness and costs is required.en
dc.format.extent8
dc.format.extent1079559
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Renal Care
dc.subjectQUALITY IMPROVEMENT
dc.subjectchronic kidney disease
dc.subjectprimary care
dc.subjectquality improvement
dc.subjectremote care
dc.subjecturinalysis
dc.subjectNephrology
dc.subjectAdvanced and Specialised Nursing
dc.titleEvaluating the feasibility and acceptability of home‐based urinalysis for albumin‐creatinine ratio with smartphone technology: A quality improvement projecten
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Health and Social Work
dc.contributor.institutionHealth & Human Sciences Research Institute
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Adult Nursing and Primary Care
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148056792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jorc.12460
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
herts.preservation.rarelyaccessedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record